You’re making the wrong argument. The LEO’s refusal to participate in the event is justified by his moral conviction. What should concern you, however, is the statement released by the dept declaring his beliefs against sodomy to be that of “bias and bigotry”.
Rationalizing this type of tyranny through impartiality is a sure way to Hell.
It's that "cost of doing business" argument that the Left has taken up: Cooperate in evil and keep your bigoted religious convictions to yourself.
|
You’re making the wrong argument. The LEO’s refusal to participate in the event is justified by his moral conviction. What should concern you, however, is the statement released by the dept declaring his beliefs against sodomy to be that of “bias and bigotry”. Rationalizing this type of tyranny through impartiality is a sure way to Hell. |
The replies on this thread are all over the map. From the officer should not be forced into working this march (No, an officer must first protect his dignity, his faith and family first) to it's OK to work this parade. (An officer’s duty is to uphold and enforce the law for EVERYONE, not for who they agree with.)
So. What would YOU do?
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]