Replies

There’s a reason they’re keeping the classified report from August of 2009 secret. NYT had an article yesterday(?) based on the memories of people who had seen the classified report, and the memories conflicted with each other. IOW, they may well be introducing the narrative they eventually want to settle on. And if what Sheriff Joe says is correct, the regime has figured out how to alter the internal properties of electronic documents so that they appear to be genuinely old (like from 2009) even though they’ve just been newly-fabricated.

As you mentioned, the media (and the regime) have no qualms about making crap up - rewriting history. If Arpaio is correct they now have the ability to fabricate records that look for all the world as if they are genuinely from years earlier.

IOW, they can alter history. The report can say whatever they want it to say and they can say those whose memories differed obviously just didn’t remember it correctly.

Seems to me that the combination of the NYT’s anonymous sources claiming the report fit the regime’s desired narrative, together with the hiding of the actual report until they’ve had a chance to make it say what they want, is preparation for just that scenario.

They can fabricate records showing that these men who have spoken up are actually psychopaths, as the HUD guy suggested. This suggestion that the unit had problems was first (to my knowledge) floated by Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, who shouldn’t have been able to know anything in any report anyway but was acting like she claimed to know about all these problems in the unit. I think she may have simply been introducing the narrative that the regime settled on...

If the regime truly has the ability that Sheriff Joe says they have, nothing is impossible to them and nobody is safe from them rewriting history to frame whoever they want.