[Know et al]

This has been a rout.

Congratulations on your victory over that windmill.

If you will go back and read my posts to you, you will see I never said your statement was wrong. The reason I took it further, is because I thought the democrats would use that same premise as talking points.

I never said he would be impeached or removed. I was implying that it is better to act on constitutional grounds and lose than to allow the illegal takeover of our government by leftists.

If that is a teeny mind, then I confess to having one. But, I am not the only one.

I hope this clears your confusion, sir.

[Know et al]

Oh, I had better head you off. I respectfully disagreed with the use of the word political not the statement as a whole.

The reason I disagreed with the use of the word political is that it is too vague and broad.

I was not saying that it was not political as far as it being done by politicians.

It leaves the possibility of someone thinking you meant a motive. I hope that helps.

[Finny]

I hope this clears your confusion, sir.

It wont. The only thing he's clear on is that he is the Great C. Edmund Wright, a lot smarter than you or me, and we should know it and respect it, dammit! {^)