Good question, no doubt the media loves the narrative. Gay embassator caught by hostile Arabs facing incredible odds. The makings of a movie that loses money, as if that matters given the lofty narrative.
This time many dare call it treason.
Using clintoonian logic it's not, because there is not A cow in Texas, there's about 10.9 million.
Wow! I have never been accused of an original idea and this is no exception. It may seem hard to believe, but I read something earlier about Judicial Watch obtaining some documents about Benghazi and a comment triggered this exact scenario in my mind. I had just logged onto FR to write a vanity post about this very theory. I am not one to believe in conspiracies, but this one has legs.
Maybe his maniacal murdering "buddies" told him "Release the terrorists or we will pull an MH370 with Air Force One, on your perpetual vacation."
Black is his cover but jihad is his game.
What happened to the initial claim of “exigent circumstance”? Will Congress investigate?
so why did Susan Estrich write that it has been proven that 3 of these guys are low level Afghan politicians and one is a low level bad guy. Only one is a terrorist. What a POS she is
Sorry to have to say it, but with such a conniving, deceitful administration, if a Taliban sympathizer/Army deserter was used as the bargaining chip to free five high-level Taliban fighters, is it that farfetched to imagine that the kidnapping of an American ambassador presented the president with the perfect opportunity to swap either the Gitmo Five or some other equally dangerous individual(s)?
Moreover, after observing the president’s dishonesty in the Bergdahl affair, it’s not that much of a stretch to believe that if Obama couldn’t get Congress to agree to swap Bergdahl in early 2012, he might have manipulated the volatile Benghazi situation in hopes that a kidnapped American diplomat would eliminate Congressional objections to a high-level prisoner swap.
The attackers road-blocked the whole Consulate neighborhood area. They were there after the beginning of the Turkish Ambassador/Stevens dinner, yet magically the Turk managed to TRANSIT those roadblocks.
He got out, just fine —how..?
Just lucky..?
:/
When the gun walking thing broke I said that an administration that does THAT is capable of ANYTHING.
Short answer: Yep.
God bless Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.
Timeline doesn’t fit for it to be a decision Obama made after the attack began.
The video lie started before anything happened in Benghazi.
The attack was planned in advance by Hillary and Obama agreed (he’s an idiot that couldn’t think his way out of a room) and Stevens was supposed to be taken hostage.
This whole nonsense with Bergdahl being the one they always intended to trade for the terrorists is nothing but a ruse.
Can’t hide that there was going to be a hostage swap so just use Bergdahl as the one that was going to be swapped and let people know about it.
If anyone heard and started asking questions about a hostage swap they could simply answer it was Burgdahl.
After all if anyone found out there was a plan to trade an Ambassador for terrorist before the Ambassador was taken hostage it wouldn’t look so good so use a ruse to CYA.
You are talking about secret coordination between two very suspicious parties. Not too likely. Too many things they couldn’t be sure of. Too risky.
I think the enemy came loaded for bear to kick some ass and send a message.