[Uncle Chip]

I pointed out the key discrepancy between the written court record and the video.

You pointed out nothing because there is no discrepancy.

All you are trying to claim is that on the video he was not answering the questions that were being asked of him that we all clearly hear and see.

What you want us all to believe is that was answering other questions from a few minutes earlier that he had refused to answer but now contrary to the advice of counsel decides to without telling anybody.

and that is ludicrous.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Well, this is getting really tedious, but you still don't have the facts straight. You say it's just me and "the guy (Fr. Zuhlsdorf) who's pouring your Kool-Aid." But it's not just me and Fr. Z. It's Abp. Carlson (who was there), Abp. Carlson's attorney Charles Goldberg (who was there), and the actual written record.

--- and Mr. Goldberg himself is the one who noted at this point in the deposition “You’re talking about mandatory reporting?”

You can flick aside all of this in favor of the idea that a bishop would say he didn't know sexual intercourse with a minor was a crime. That makes no sense in any legal jurisdiction in the USA, or on this or any other planet. It contradicts the record. But that's your choice.

We're through.