Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Cruz formally gives up Canadian citizenship
Yahoo/AP ^ | June 10, 2014 | WILL WEISSERT

Posted on 06/11/2014 6:13:39 PM PDT by kingattax

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Canada-born U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has made good on a promise to renounce his birth country's citizenship — doing so amid speculation he could make a run at the White House in 2016.

Spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said Cruz's action became official May 14 and that Texas' junior senator received written confirmation at his home in Houston on Tuesday. She said the tea-party-backed Republican "is pleased to have the process finalized."

"Being a U.S. Senator representing Texas, it makes sense he should be only an American citizen," Frazier said in an email.

Cruz, 43, was born in Calgary, Alberta, in 1970, while his parents were working in the oil business there. His mother, Eleanor, is from Delaware, while his father, Rafael, is a Cuban became a U.S. citizen in 2005.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; cruzcanada
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: ansel12

That is an excerpt from CATO.


41 posted on 06/11/2014 10:13:14 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
" Sorry, but your opinion does not trump the US Constitution, US Law, or SCOTUS rulings and none of those have any such definition. Not even close. "

I did not give any definition of NBC. The Constitution does not define NBC so that could be argued indefinitely. I'm using logic.

The framers added the NBC requirement to ensure loyalty to the US. Simply having one citizen as a parent and being born on foreign soil does not logically fit the obvious intention of the framers.

Using your line of thinking a US citizen man could travel to communist china, have sex with a communist Chinese citizen and the child would still be a natural born US citizen qualified for the presidency. There is no difference in this scenario and that of Ted Cruz.

42 posted on 06/11/2014 11:19:34 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So there is no historical data that argues otherwise? Zero? Right? Wrong. It is a question, and you know it.


43 posted on 06/12/2014 4:07:51 AM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Anyone who ignores the information they’ve dug up is the real loser. Knowledge is a powerful weapon.


44 posted on 06/12/2014 6:29:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise
So there is no historical data that argues otherwise? Zero? Right? Wrong. It is a question, and you know it.

As of right now, it is not a Legal question, and therefore, of no importance in determining whether or not Ted Cruz is NBC.

By Law, by the Constitution, TODAY, he is NBC.

The only thing that will change that is an Amendment to the US Constitution, a new US Law, or a new SCOTUS ruling.
45 posted on 06/12/2014 6:35:37 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Anyone who ignores the information they’ve dug up is the real loser. Knowledge is a powerful weapon.

Once again, dig up all of the background information you like, as of TODAY, Ted Cruz is legally and constitutionally NBC.

The only way to change that and have the LAW agree with your OPINION is to Amend the Constitution, pass a new US Law, or have a new SCOTUS opinion.
46 posted on 06/12/2014 6:37:18 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I guess that you didn't really read my first post: Actually this subject has been discussed thoroughly on Obama threads. Obama didn’t qualify. His father was not and never wanted to be a citizen. Cruz’ father became a citizen.

Post 18

47 posted on 06/12/2014 7:21:49 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Then once again we've redefined the meaning of the Constitution in direct opposition to the intent of the framers.

The laws and SCOTUS decisions being quoted didn't exist when the framers added the NBC requirement. Yet the intent of the framers was clearly to protect the United States by limiting the presidency to loyal Americans. Simply having one citizen parent does absolutely nothing to protect the United States from the rule of a foreign born president who could be surreptitiously loyal to another country and form of government.

I have serious doubts the framers would be ok with a person born and raised in the middle east as a Muslim under Sharia Law being qualified to be president simply because the father was a US citizen.

FYI, I'm not worried about Ted Cruz, I live in Texas and did my part in getting him elected. I'm worried about the above scenario which will happen and with grave consequences. Take our current situation as a case in point.

48 posted on 06/12/2014 8:59:42 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You are not only wrong, you’re dead wrong. I love Cruz. I would love to support him for Prez. I can’t support him in the primaries because I know this will be an issue. If he wins the nomination however I will support him wholeheartedly.


49 posted on 06/12/2014 6:16:38 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You are not only wrong, you’re dead wrong. I love Cruz. I would love to support him for Prez. I can’t support him in the primaries because I know this will be an issue. If he wins the nomination however I will support him wholeheartedly.


50 posted on 06/12/2014 6:16:38 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson