[wagglebee]

If the answer is "no", the heir to the British throne, though having an American father, is not eligible, then it has great significance to this discussion, does it not?

This debate is about Ted Cruz, NOT your red herring.

[William Tell]

wagglebee said: "This debate is about Ted Cruz, NOT your red herring. "

I thought the debate was about the meaning of a Constitutional restriction.

Is the heir to the throne in my hypothetical eligible or not? If you believe that the heir to the British Throne can be eligible to be President, why not just say so?

You lead me to believe that your opinion is that the heir would NOT be eligible.