Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soros-funded Liberals Abandon Ukraine to Putin
aim.org ^ | May 15, 2014 | Cliff Kincaid  

Posted on 06/12/2014 12:16:08 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

George Soros has been blamed by the pro-Russia crowd for sparking the anti-communist revolution in Ukraine. That was never the case, since Soros funded a small and largely ineffective non-governmental organization in Ukraine, theRenaissance Foundation. Now, a major Soros-funded group has come out with its prescription for resolving the crisis—accepting Russia’s demand that the country stay out of NATO. ....

NATO is hardly the anti-communist alliance it once was, but it still remains the largest pro-American group of nations on earth. That’s why the Russians hate it so much.

Ahead of the scheduled elections on May 25, the International Crisis Group (ICG) has just released a report saying Ukrainian leaders should “declare that they do not desire NATO membership.” The ICG receives a significant amount of funding from Soros’s Open Society Institute, and Soros sits on its board.

This follows former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger’s statements on CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS” show on May 11, during which he argued that Putin should be accommodated in his drive to take over Ukraine. Kissinger said the West.should agree to keep Ukraine out of NATO.

Kissinger, whose firm does business in Russia, says Ukraine “will be free to participate in European economic relationships, but not join NATO.”

The global elites have clearly decided that Ukraine must be sacrificed in the name of protecting the big businesses investing in Putin’s Russia.

Not surprisingly, the ICG/Kissinger position is essentially the same as the one held by Russia. The Moscow-funded propaganda channel RT featuresRussian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov as saying, “The seeds for the current crisis were sown in 2008 in April during the NATO summit in Bucharest, when NATO leaders stated in a declaration that Georgia and Ukraine would be in NATO.” But the “seeds” never sprouted and Putin invaded Ukraine anyway.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/12/2014 12:16:08 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

What is the purpose of NATO in today’s world?


2 posted on 06/12/2014 12:21:09 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

The purpose of NATO is a defensive alliance against the Neo-Soviet expanionist Russian terrorist dictatorship which arms and supports every Communist regime in the world, which helps islamists slaughter Christians in Sudan, and is helping the Ayatollahs get nukes to wipe Israel off the map.


3 posted on 06/12/2014 12:27:47 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; caww

I don’t know what to say here. Soros was involved but he failed? The NWO threw Ukraine to the dogs?


4 posted on 06/12/2014 12:28:57 PM PDT by McGruff (I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

“What is the purpose of NATO in today’s world?”

To suck up American resources, people and money in order to prop up the bizarre entity known as the EU.


5 posted on 06/12/2014 12:34:15 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Happier than a Svoboda skinhead with a free new armband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

to support french welfare state...


6 posted on 06/12/2014 12:44:27 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“the Renaissance Foundation”

Lol...
RF is hardly “Small”, and they coordinated with The Omidyar Network, which has a much bigger presence in Ukraine.

Omidyar co-funded the revolutionary groups, along with backdoor money from the Obama Administration funneled via USAID, in cooperation with them. Omidyar is/was Rybachuk’s primary funder.

What is really curious is how the BIG money didn’t start arriving until after Dems/Obama wonks went on TV saying, “There are other ways to get at Putin”, after the Syria debacle.


7 posted on 06/12/2014 12:50:36 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Which dems said that?


8 posted on 06/12/2014 12:52:48 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Come on, name some names.

Don’t you want to expose the dems who are behind this conspiracy?

This isn’t just another totally false alex jones tinfoil lie you made up is it?


9 posted on 06/12/2014 1:00:08 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

www.google.com


10 posted on 06/12/2014 1:08:48 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

So you just made it up. Yeah, I knew it. Nobody said that. You can’t name even one single person.

Everything you post is nothing but lies.


11 posted on 06/12/2014 1:22:22 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

So, by what you are saying, NATO should be the Global police force? Where does the UN fit in?


12 posted on 06/12/2014 11:11:51 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

.


13 posted on 06/13/2014 8:38:36 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

NATO is not a global police force because it is only required to come to the aid of its member states. NATO is a traditional military alliance, the most powerful military alliance in history. Why would we want to ever give up our own military dominance? Who would you prefer to have the most powerful military alliance in the world? NATO is at odds with the UN because NATO can act without UN permission and has done so. That is why Russia and China hate NATO, because Russia and China are part of the UN Security Council so the UN cannot do anything without their permission, but NATO can and has. NATO stands in the way of a globalist UN world order where the USA would act in deference to our Russian and Chinese enemies.


14 posted on 06/13/2014 11:06:50 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson