About a month ago, I saw a very similar comment in an article that went on to explain why the big Zero shouldn't be blamed for all he does. Anyone know if it was another Andrew McCarthy propaganda piece? It seems ironic that he writes about a case to impeach Obama, but also acts as part of the defense.
I regret ever supporting the invasion of that country. We overthrew a brutal dictator in Saddam, but secular, iron-fisted dictators are what creatures in those countries need... a forceful jackboot that keeps them properly suppressed. They aren’t capable of representative government. I had too much faith that the Bush administration had a clue as to what it was doing. It didn’t... they were winging it the whole way.
Every time Obama puts his foot in it some F’in Repub comes along with a story how the Repubs are also to blame for the problem. STFU and stop flying cover for the commie in chief you stupid A-hole.
There were a few problems with Bush’s approach. One, he threw out all the Baahthist military generals that could have worked with the defeated Iraqi army and knew how to deal with Islamists. Two, political correctness pressure prevented what really needed to happen in Iraq, a de-Islamification process.
Obama just ignored Iraq completely. Negligence is far worse in this situation. And Obama’s tireless support for Islamic radicalism inspires AQ.
Links?