As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following. Politically correct interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protections Clause aside, the only aspect of sex that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment. Otherwise, the Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that government power to regulate sex outside the context of voting is reserved uniquely to the states. So the judge who made the ruling concerning Alabama is likely a pro-gay activist, wrongly legislating gay rights from the bench.
One remedy to judicial activism is the following. Patriots need to work with state and federal lawmakers to make punitive laws which require judges to promptly, clearly and publicly state, to the satisfaction of voters, the specific constitutional clauses which they believe justify their case decisions. And judges who fail to reasonably comply with such requirements can not only be removed from the bench, but possibly spend a few nights in the crossbar motel.
I plan to review this ruling carefully, and try to vote the SOBs out of office if it’s apparent they’re caving to the homosexual agenda. All judges are elective offices in Alabama.
It should be the same for the feds. They make themselves political animals and they should be required to stand for election to political office.