Posted on 06/17/2014 10:04:38 PM PDT by Kevin in California
She is more caring than us, because it was for the children. Of course she ended it with the parents should come too so they could be a family. Only Marxism cares.
Pray America wakes up
Kirsten should lead by example.
Let her do the modern version of “There Was an Old Lady Who Lived in a Shoe”.
Her leftie friends must have really read her the riot act.
What Kirsten Powers said, or rather shrieked, last night on O’Really? was that the US is so wealthy that all of the children from other countries who can come here, should, and we obligated to take care of them....and then she immediately denied that she said it. I was watching and was entertained by her notion that we should take care of all these kids because they are “the children” when we have so many problems ourselves and are so deep in debt already. Gotta’ do it for the children, doncha know? She makes this outrageous statement that of all the poor, deprived, mistreated and abused children of the world should be taken care of by the American taxpayer. Then lies about it. Then she lies about lying about it. She’s a typical lying liberal.
I’ve noticed lately, that Powers is one of the few, if only, liberal guests on O’Really? that gets away with talking over him when he’s trying to cut her off and she just keeps on yapping and yapping. What happened to his No Spin Zone? You get the feeling that he likes her.
But there is essentially nothing new here folks. So let’s move along. Go about your business.
“Liberal mantra “With my guilt and your gelt we can do anything!”
And more disturbing in Kirsten’s case is that she’s “found Jesus.” She said recently that an old boyfriend “converted her to “Christianity” from Atheism, so it only makes sense that she’s invested with helping “the world’s disadvantaged children” with someone else’s money.
I heard her on BOR last night. She’s delusional. Libtard fever has made her nuts.
I can only go by my observations. In 2012, many otherwise conservative people let their fear rule them. As a result of their actions, the GOP was given carte blanche to sprint of the right wing reservation faster than Scotty with a fresh set of Dilithium crystals. Most admitted that they not only lost as they were told they would, but contributed to the problem. This is why you see so many of them determined to not make that same mistake in the coming midterms with the RINOs.
On the other hand, there are a handful of remaining Romneybots determined to assist his latest attempt to get back in the game and further help solidify the left wing agenda in America. The last week is filled with those people making the same tired excuses as always and more than two years out with 300,000,000 million other people to choose from, they want ‘that guy. Already. A couple flat out said it.
Then there are those in between. rather than admit their prior error or resolve to not repeat it, they hedge and wiggle their way around the issue. they things like...
“Don’t blame me; I voted for Romney, though under normal circumstances, I PROBABLY would not have done so. But when you’re up against a Marxist President, the circumstances are obviously NOT normal.”
Now I emphasized the word ‘probably’ in that quote because words mean things. “Probably” infers that this person, ‘under normal circumstances” has not ruled out voting for a hard left abortion funding, homosexual promoting, socialized medicine creating, gun hating candidate like Mitt Romney.
Now since words in fact mean things, it is a completely logical position to conclude, based on facts in evidence, that the person mentioned above has not in fact, shed their liberalism at all. They just suppressed it and it will reemerge as the personal ethics of the situation dictate..
I voted for Santorum in the primary. I voted for Romney in the general.
Well, I do know that about 4 million of you “stood on principle”, and look where we are now.
I’m sorry I’m not perfect like you. Enjoy your high horse.
Reinforces my point perfectly. You chose freely to vote for a screaming liberal after a much more conservative guy in the primary. That’s regressing by any definition.
No net gain or moving right there. It is a clear unambiguous move back to the left because his record is clear as a windless desert sky at noon. And that isn’t even debatable.
Yup, another lesser evil / Purists are evil fan. Game set match.
Who did you vote for? If you are so critical of who I voted for, you might as well come clean as to which unwinnable candidate you supported.
Why? What difference at this point does it make? you can guess which I didn’t vote for and neither of us won.
But it wasn’t a lesser evil.
She’s in her little bubble of fine income, nice things, secure future, and she simply doesn’t understand those Americans who are jobless or underemployed hoping for some vestige of economic opportunity.
From her happy-happy vantage point, it’s all about smiles, nice meals, and her exercise times.
That’s what everyone does, isn’t it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.