Posted on 06/18/2014 3:38:10 AM PDT by lowbridge
Sounds familiar.
LOL! Bump later fun reading...
They stole it from the US Democratic Party
Well of course they do. Conquerors always try to disarm the population.
I strongly suspect US troops had similar rules for Germany and Japan during their occupation.
They very well have a more difficult time enforcing it than the ‘0bama Civilian National Security Force, “as well equipped and as well funded as the military.”’ will when they come to collect ours.
Cool. A gun free zone country. A great place for the American anti-gunners to hang.
bttt
Have they banned all fun yet? Has anyone been keeping close tabs on Bloomberg since he left office?
Have y’all seen this
The ISIS balance sheet.
Great. More instruction for Obama and Bloomberg and Pelosi on how to destroy America.....
Also:
No bibles
No Christians
No Jews
No homos
No atheists
No bikinis
No alcohol
No freedom of speech or religion
No right to redress grievances
No freedom to assemble
No women’s rights
No freedom of press
What more proof does anyone need to show that ISIS is an obama front gang.
See — gun control — they are really just Democrats —
It’s a Democratic Revolution.
Free men are armed... slaves are NOT!
ISIS and Democrats have very similar philosophies—not that it’s news to anybody here.
It is now the law the can shoot anyone with a gun that is not them. How very 1939.
Actually, that is historically not really accurate.
Most Muslim cultures since the 19th century have used slave armies, with the Mamelukes and Jannisaries just the most famous. They tended to eventually take over the government, for obvious reasons.
There are many other examples down thru history of slaves being routinely armed, often by a noble or monarch to use against his “free” subjects.
Under Communist governments, in practice all are slaves of the State. Some of those slaves are issued arms to use against the rest of the slaves when necessary.
The direct association of freedom with bearing arms is more or less a western civ idea.
I’m not disputing the truth of your statement, merely pointing out that it is not universally true.
Right, but the history lesson is sort of unnecessary...
Everyone here gets the idea that ‘Free men are armed and _________ fill in the blank (slaves, serfs, oppressed people, etc.), are NOT’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.