Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS to propose specific limits on nonprofits’ political activities
The Washington Post ^ | June 18, 2014 | Josh Hicks

Posted on 06/19/2014 4:22:12 PM PDT by Timber Rattler

The Internal Revenue Service will propose new guidelines next year that would cap the amount of political activity allowed for tax-exempt advocacy groups, according to the agency’s commissioner.

The new plan, the agency’s second attempt at writing guidelines for so-called social welfare groups, could be a game-changer for organizations such as Americans for Prosperity, part of a conservative network supported by Charles and David Koch, and the League of Conservation Voters, a group on the left.

Campaign-finance watchdogs have complained that a growing number of nonprofits are using “dark money” to influence elections, since the existing 501(c)(4) rules allow them to collect unlimited financial contributions without disclosing their donors. Stricter guidelines could make the groups less attractive to donors.

The IRS’s latest plan would address questions left unanswered from the controversial draft guidelines that it unveiled in November. The initial proposal focused on defining political activity, leaving aside matters such as how much activity would be allowed.

The Center for Public Integrity first reported the latest IRS strategy Wednesday, citing an interview with IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. Koskinen said he expects a new draft of the 501(c)(4) regulations by early 2015.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crooked; fraud; irs; waronconservatives
Remember those hated proposed guidelines from this past winter?

IRS backtracks on 501(c)4 rule after flood of negative comments

Well, they're back....

1 posted on 06/19/2014 4:22:12 PM PDT by Timber Rattler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I can’t believe the American people are allowing the government to silence them. This is a de facto revocation of a large portion of the 1st Amendment.

Barack Obama has the same number of letters in his name as Adolf Hitler. This is not by coincidence.


2 posted on 06/19/2014 4:26:26 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Will only apply to Non Democrat Party Groups


3 posted on 06/19/2014 4:26:47 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

To paraphrase Ernest Hollingsworth. “Theahs too much free speech ‘n goin’ on.”


4 posted on 06/19/2014 4:30:39 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

In direct defiance of a SCOTUS ruling.

The administartion has effectively neutered Congress.
Now it is trying to neuter the courts.


5 posted on 06/19/2014 4:33:49 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

The purpose of the IRS should be to raise revenue and not micromanage the speech of certain groups. Because it is unable to perform its function correctly, it should be abolished. (To say nothing of its penchant for abuse.) It’s time for a consumption tax to completely replace the present tax system.


6 posted on 06/19/2014 4:35:05 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

One day. Soon. The home addresses of everybody that works for this criminal organization will be exposed.

Not a tear will be shed.

F U B O!


7 posted on 06/19/2014 4:36:56 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

of course


8 posted on 06/19/2014 4:37:11 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

unelected bureaucrats and judges making law is lawlessness


9 posted on 06/19/2014 4:38:19 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Indeed, selectively enforced of course.


10 posted on 06/19/2014 4:39:30 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
.


So now they insist that churches teach what they want them to teach which is an abomination to God.


Yep ... and some day coming to all IRS 501-C3 tax-exempt churches in America.

Don't blame me ... I'm just the messenger.

Questions ?

Muster up the courage to do the free IRS download of "Pamplet P1828" which specifies the legal details of your tax-exempt church's sertitude to it's U.S. Government Masters.

Heck, I'll even do you the favor of providing the internet link:

IRS Legal Obligations of Tax-Exempt Christian Churches and Pastors" - (click)


 photo IRS-950_zpsa5223654.jpg



 photo IRS-940_zps073562f1.jpg

 photo IRS-960_zps439557d1.jpg

 photo IRS-830_zpsec27dc18.jpg

.




IRS & Church Marriage vs. "Render Unto Caesar" ...

IRS & Church Marriage vs. "Render Unto Caesar" - (click)



America's Spiritual Revival and Healing - The Obstacle ...

.America's Spiritual Revival and Healing - The Obstacle ... - (click)




Pro-Life Victory vs. "Render Unto Caesar" ...

Pro-Life Victory vs. "Render Unto Caesar" - (click)




Tea Party Christians and "Render Unto Caesar" ...

Tea Party Christians and "Render Unto Caesar" - (click)


.

11 posted on 06/19/2014 5:10:45 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Does anyone with a brain believe, even for an Obama nanosecond, that such a rule will be enforced against liberal organizations?


12 posted on 06/19/2014 5:24:31 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The Obamas' Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

So, that means the NAACP will have to curtail it’s advocacy. As well as Rainbow Push, ACORN (or whatever they call themselves now) and Al Sharpton. /s


13 posted on 06/19/2014 5:38:42 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

‘Darrell Issa Calls On White House Attorney to Testify On IRS Email Scandal’

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa requested the testimony of White House Counsel’s Office lawyer Jennifer O’Connor at next Tuesday’s hearing on the IRS lost emails scandal.

Issa wrote a letter to O’Connor, who worked at the IRS in the first months of its conservative targeting scandal in 2013 and was promoted to the White House earlier this year, asking her to appear alongside IRS commissioner John Koskinen at Tuesday’s Oversight hearing. Issa made clear that he thinks O’Connor “knew or should have known” that ex-IRS official Lois Lerner’s emails were missing.

The IRS claimed that it lost 24,000 of Lerner’s emails to and from other Obama administration agencies and the White House from 2009 to 2011, in addition to emails from six other IRS staffers. The emails are expected to be able to shed light on the IRS conservative targeting scandal that has plagued the Obama administration for more than a year.

“From May 2013 until November 2013, you served in a career position at the IRS as the Counselor to the Commissioner, with the primary task of ‘navigat[ing] the scandal over [the IRS’s] reviews of conservative organizations,’” Issa wrote.

“In this position, you had a direct and substantial role in the IRS’ response to congressional requests for documents, including documents sent or received by Ms. Lerner,” Issa wrote. “In fact, IRS Chief Counsel William Wilkins, when asked who was supervising the collection of, ‘documents relating to the committee’s requests for material,’ responded ‘Tom Kane and Jennifer [O’Connor] are the two I would identify as the key supervisors.’”

“Given your prominent role in supervising the IRS’s document review and production processes, you likely knew or should have known that the IRS was missing a portion of e-mails sent or received by Ms. Lerner responsive to the Committee’s subpoena,” Issa wrote.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/19/darrell-issa-calls-on-white-house-attorney-to-testify-on-irs-email-scandal/


14 posted on 06/19/2014 6:15:33 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (‘You can avoid reality, but you can’t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Sander Levin is a big putz! a tool of the left.....


15 posted on 06/20/2014 9:57:03 AM PDT by ncfool (Hilary 2016 Procol Harum or Boko Haram. What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson