Posted on 06/22/2014 5:13:51 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Much like DeQuincy’s autobiographical Confessions of an Opium Eater, a true Marxist is addicted to Revolution. Why? Because only through revolution can a liberal hope to overturn government enough to force his fellow citizens into embracing socialism. But why the desperate demand for all persons to acquiesce to communism? Because Marxism is a religion, and a violently missionary one, at that.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Er, no. New Harmony might have been the first secular socialist experiment (Assuming we don't count the Diggers and the Ranters as something less than Christian). Socialism was first formally theorized by Plato and was practices by countless heretical Christian sects. Joachiamites, Adamites, Brethren of the Free Spirit, Taborites, Munster flavored Anabaptists, the list is a long one.
Why can’t something like this be printed in the N.Y. Times?What a dumb question. The answer is self explanatory.
Does that remind anyone of any particular religion?
Bump
When it comes, track Pelosi, Reid, et all very closely.
We do not want them to escape.
The guillotine should be rebuilt and sharpened...and iPhones prepared to record the bouncing of their low IQ heads....to be played perpetually to show what happens to low moral POS morons.
Oh, don’t forget the stakes upon which their heads will be placed...on the bridge leading to the Lincoln memorial.
Obama sure spends a lot of time on the golf course. The true believers don’t do that.
The socialists/communists are unwilling to share their fruits with other like minded socialists as a lifestyle. It must be mandatory for EVERYONE to participate in order for the implementers to gain the power they crave. For the leaders of communism, it has nothing to do with the good of the people, or the country, or even “for the children”, but everything to do with absolute power.
The members of society who support these power hungry fanatics are simply too stupid to realize they will be powerless to run their own lives, or too lazy to run their own lives.
Lenin was an angry child, who grew into a furious adult after the government executed his brother. In the book, Lenin: The Compulsive Revolutionary, Stefan Possony describes Lenin’s essential lawlessness, writing, “His immorality and even criminality are starkly etched…” In fact, Marxism is also a quintessentially lawless, immoral and criminal movement. This is because the very idea behind Marxism is the rightness of overturning all authority, confiscating all property, eliminating all foes, and rebuilding society from the ground up. So it goes without saying that all rules and laws are deemed expendable in such a scheme.
And again, as Possony describes Lenin below, I saw these characteristics in more and more children (both boys and girls) in the last few years in which I taught school:
Possony describes Lenin as,
Self-righteous, rude, demanding, ruthless, despotic, formalistic, bureaucratic, disciplined, cunning, intolerant, stubborn, one-sided, suspicious, distant, asocial, cold-blooded, ambitious, purposive, vindictive, spiteful, a grudge-holder, and a coward…Lenin appeared to be unpretentious and soft-spoken. His enormous willpower was hidden behind a facade of modesty. His personality was basically cold, yet he gave the impression of warmth.
We are about to enter a period of unprecedented sociopolitical problems.
Sounds way too familiar : |
Dear Lord, hear our prayers.
Tatt
Does it need to be sharp? Rusty and dull would work, too. /S
Must be why the democrats are in locked step with the Fabian society.
Yeh I’ll second that emotion. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.