Posted on 06/22/2014 9:31:25 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
These submarines are meant to counter any ambitions the Chinese may have on Siberian resources. Strategically it presents a challenge to defend Pacific Russia in the event of a chaotic war. The Russians would have to control the sea lanes if they hoped to successfully defend a land assault.
Just because they are designed for a specific task does not mean they will not be used for other tasks.
I don't know how well even one would do against a carrier group, but I don't think anyone wants to find out.
Looks like a Victor III
They make lousy subs
Wonder what her noise signature is.
I bet she beats and sings.
It took 21 years to bring to fruition?
Jeezus Louisus.
How do you figure? China shares a border with Russia thousands of miles long. If they want to grab Siberian resources, which I admit is a big Russian fear, they’re not going to load up an amphibious assault ship. They’ll attack straight across the border, probably through Mongolia.
A fancy Russian sub is not going to be much help in that kind of war.
A sub that can hit Chinese shipping and send cruise missiles into Beijing won’t be much help?
Not the point, Geron. Sure, if there was a general invasion of Siberia by PLA forces, that sub would play a significant role in making life difficult for the PLAN, but I doubt if they would sic it on container ships. The Liaoning would be a much more scrumptious target. And, besides that, Russia still has a significant array of surface and submarine assets to go after merchantmen if that is indeed their desire.
My point is that if the Chinese ever got a wild hair up their butts and decided to invade and annex a chunk of Siberia, that sub is not going to be much use in the land battles that would inevitably result, so I strongly doubt it was designed primarily, or even incidentally to deter Chinese aggression.
That’s a hunter killer. A creature of the depths. It’s prey is other submarines or major surface combatants. Of course it has a strategic mission brief as well, but if they get to the point where they are flinging cruise missiles around, Russia’s Strategic Rocket Forces and short ranged IRBMs would be a much more potent worry.
Why would they target American 'rat nests? American cities do more to destroy America than any attack could.
One could say the same for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. They stood up that program office BEFORE I moved to DC Metro in 1992. . .
Cute, Cute but with a large BS factor. At 13,800 tons it can be quiet but not fast. If the shroud over the prop is real then there is not enough prop to make anywhere near 35 knots. And Ivan has yet to work up the nerve to spend real money on sound isolating flex hose or equipment mounts. At best what it might do is block a harbor someplace. But it’s not going to keep up with a supercarrier fleet. I used to build this stuff in a former life and the numbers with respect to what one can shove thru the water and the power required really are carved in naval stone. The fact that Ivan is publicizing the launch smacks more of blufing/crowing than sending an actual message of strength. Like when they gassed up the Bears and made a few passes by Alaska a few years ago.
Looks like a big “immersion” blender...
Actually, in ap political and world conquest sense, that is a very good point...
Our threat is not annihilation in a nuclear flash (if you live in a big city...
But a targeted attack from a terrorist led jihad, that is waiting for the opportunity to present itself...It is not a matter of who, or what, it is when...
Russian, Chinese...It is not in their best interest to destroy this country anymore...Only allow it to further be subjugated and put on the verge of collapse, so they can emerge as victors on the world stage...
And we become slaves to the new norm...Which in some cases we already are...
“These submarines are meant to counter any ambitions the Chinese may have on Siberian resources.”
This is crazy. Construction began in 1993. I am guessing that design was begun before Reagan left office.
This thing was squarely aimed at the USA.
AND FURTHERMORE, if china wants siberia, china will not go 3000 miles OUT OF THEIR WAY to try a COMPLICATED AMPHIBIOUS LANDING when china SHARES A 2000 MILE LONG LAND BORDER WITH SIBERIA.
I MEAN ARE YOU NUTS.
“Why would they target American ‘rat nests? American cities do more to destroy America than any attack could. “
Have you been to Manhatan, San Jose or Boston ?
These are liberal but great contributing cities not to mention the scientific elites are there at MIT, NYU and Stanford/Berkeley.
I meant hitting their government buildings.
Destroying the govt. buildings, much like our govt. buildings would not hurt them that much. It might even help.
Furthermore, the Chinese govt. knows whats important and their most important govt. functions are also in Shanghai and Hong Kong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.