Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maliki Isn’t The Problem. Oil Is.
Defense One ^ | June 22, 2014 | By Nora Bensahel

Posted on 06/24/2014 12:53:37 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

During the past few days, the United States strategy for addressing the escalating violence in Iraq has emphasized diplomacy to achieve political reconciliation. The Obama administration and many members of Congress are blaming Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki for having fanned Iraq’s sectarian flames. Maliki has indeed systematically concentrated power in his own hands, and has excluded Sunnis, Kurds, and even other Shiite groups wherever and wherever possible. It’s no surprise, then, that many Sunnis have rightly concluded that the current political system will never benefit them, and that some of them are taking up arms to help a Sunni extremist group overthrow that political system.

But the fundamental political problem in Iraq isn’t Maliki himself. It’s the fact that Iraq is an oil state – and any new Iraqi leader, whether Sunni, Shiite, or Kurd – would likely govern in much the same way as Maliki has.

Oil states are almost always autocracies, and it’s easy to understand why. They don’t depend on taxing their citizens in order to generate revenue, the way that most states do. Instead, they generate tremendous revenues simply by selling oil. Controlling the state means controlling the oil, which means controlling oil revenues, which translates directly into political power. And that means that whoever controls the state will do whatever they can to maintain that control – by providing lavish benefits to their supporters while seeking to quash potential opposition before it arises. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseone.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/24/2014 12:53:37 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I don’t buy the thesis “oil wealth naturally leads to autocracy”.

Norway is fine. Socialism and greed lead to autocracy. A violent culture of winner takes all leads to autocracy.

Oil may be relatively more important as its share of the GDP rises, but its revenues go into the federal budget.

Control over the budget, regardless the source of the revenue, is where you get the political power of patronage and subsidy. The public’s votes are still largely how you get elected in Iraq.


2 posted on 06/24/2014 1:19:39 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Islam is the problem. We are witnessing an extention of the free for all Soviet-Democrat system.

Seize an oil field, give 1% to grease a bunch of politicians willing to sell it all out for that much to give credit to the terrorists.


3 posted on 06/24/2014 1:27:13 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

NO BLOOD FOR OPIUM!


4 posted on 06/24/2014 4:13:57 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Shia’s and Kurds have the oil, the Sunnis areas don’t.


5 posted on 06/24/2014 6:50:47 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson