To: Q-ManRN
Much of the South and West sides of Chicago are absolute disaster zones and more dangerous than a lot of third world countries. No amount of gun control will fix it. Only a military occupation would. The North side of Chicago is fairly safe however.
4 posted on
06/24/2014 7:22:42 AM PDT by
Borges
To: Borges
It all comes down to culture,or lack thereof.
11 posted on
06/24/2014 7:27:31 AM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: Borges
Only a military occupation would.Military occupation wouldn't solve anything. Those areas would still be full of 3rd world people. They'll kill each other just out of sight of the soldiers and none of the witnesses will say they've seen anything. Hell, some of them would kill each other right in front of the soldiers.
14 posted on
06/24/2014 7:48:21 AM PDT by
Count of Monte Fisto
(The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
To: Borges
Much of the South and West sides of Chicago are absolute disaster zones and more dangerous than a lot of third world countries. No amount of gun control will fix it. Only a military occupation would. The North side of Chicago is fairly safe however. Since the "East side" of Chicago is very sparsely populated - being that it's under Lake Michigan - what you're saying is that two-thirds of Chicago is a disaster zone and one third is "fairly safe."
15 posted on
06/24/2014 8:29:14 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: Borges
IIRC, a few years back virtually all the killings took place in 10% of Chicago. And 70% of the VICTIMS had a police record...
21 posted on
06/24/2014 5:28:42 PM PDT by
Mr Rogers
(Left wing. Right wing. One buzzard.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson