More name-calling when your arguments don’t stand up to reason and common sense [Only boneheaded dogmatists...]
According to you there is zero fraudulent scientific studies - they’re all just honest mistakes.
I can’t help but notice the majority of my factual statements are ignored.
******* "A fanatic is one who can not change his mind and will not change the subject." Winston Churchill *******
That, to me, is a fair description of what I called, "boneheaded dogmatists" -- as a behaviorial class (not as a personal accusation).
Since you were making scurrilous charges about scientists as a class, I felt it only proper to counter your accusation with a strong categorization of those who DO NOT continue to seek truth, because their minds are closed.
On that matter, your FRProfile position seemed to place us in fairly close accordance.
I did not make any claims (as you did) about all "scientists", per se, nor did I claim that there are no "bad apples" within the greater profession.
I corrected your misperception re "how science is done" -- and, then, questioned your authority to make the perfidious accusation that all scientists (including me) are pecuniarily driven.
If one makes sweeping claims, one must possess very broad authority -- so I asked if you were so equipped. Seemed a fair response to one who had denigrated me and my profession -- and my very motivation for how I have spent my life -- and my calling. Since I am a member of your reviled vocation, I (silly me!) took it as a personal insult.
While we consider who owes whom an apology, I will review all your comments on this thread to see if there are any "factual statements" that I overlooked. Meanwhile, you might repeat (or at least point out) whatever you deemed "factual" for my edification and education; I wouldn't want to miss any enlightenment...