Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner to Sue White House Over Executive Orders
Townhall ^ | June 25, 2014 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 06/25/2014 5:13:32 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Spktyr

Maybe so, but it may also be a case of first impression that the Supremes will then need to figger out. We all know impeachment is a bust, so why not sue and see what happens. Better than sitting on hands like the pubes are doing now.


21 posted on 06/25/2014 6:43:14 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This is a fools errand, and may end up making the GOP look not only foolish, but impotent. The House has no standing to sue the chief executive because he is recalcitrant at enforcing the law. The Supremes will say that is what elections are for. We are royally screwed.


22 posted on 06/25/2014 7:01:41 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Obama has no respect for the rule of law. If, IF, he had standing and IF he won the case, who will enforce the judgement...Obama? We have watched obama give the codified law the middle finger for the past 6 years. He would just do the same here. Impeach Holder, Koskinin, the EPA chief and anyone else who is below obama. Defund obamas favorite pet projects. But sue??????? Meant to take our minds off of what they did to McDaniels. Let us not forget.


23 posted on 06/25/2014 8:20:09 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

Not necessarily so. An older Supreme Court case holds that a legislative body (state legislature) has standing to sue the chief executive (governor) for failing to enforce duly enacted laws because that refusal has the effect of completely nullifying the votes of all the legislators (i.e., how the legislature voted becomes irrelevant). That case is Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939). Coleman was discussed by the Court in Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997), a case in which 6 members of Congress sued to prevent Clinton from exercising the line item veto Congress had recently enacted, and was accepted as granting standing to a legislature where the executive’s actions have the effect of “completely nullifying” the acts of the legislature.

That is what Obuttocks is doing here, at least that is what we’re claiming he’s doing - nullifying the vote of the entire Congress by completely ignoring the laws duly passed and signed into law by prior presidents. That should give the House standing under Coleman.


24 posted on 06/25/2014 8:29:30 PM PDT by Oceander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

This is just for show....


25 posted on 06/25/2014 9:55:19 PM PDT by primrose (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
That will go in the DOJ round file before holder reads it. Next day headlines,

"Racist republicans on witch hunt."

26 posted on 06/25/2014 10:01:56 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson