Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2014 7:06:44 AM PDT by navysealdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: navysealdad

The important issue is does this SCOTUS decision *invalidate* all the decisions the NLRB made with its improper appointees? Unless it does, this is all for naught.


146 posted on 06/26/2014 9:40:22 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad
A unanimous Supreme Smackdown of the Liberal Messiah's dictatorial appointments. Even His own appointments wouldn't back Him. If the Republicans take the Senate, His minions in His administration will be the only part of the federal government backing Him. The walls are closing in on Him; hopefully He'll snap soon.
150 posted on 06/26/2014 10:27:42 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

Not sure what got into the Supremes, but I like it..so far.


153 posted on 06/26/2014 10:49:57 AM PDT by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

of course it’s unaminous. the liberal court wants to limit any future conservative president in 2016, and this ruling makes them appear objective right now.


154 posted on 06/26/2014 11:46:38 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

What difference, at this point, does it make?

155 posted on 06/26/2014 12:04:14 PM PDT by Old Sarge (TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

“partisan clash”

Apparently, this had nothing to do with Constitutionally illegal behavior by a President as declared by a united Supreme Court in their first ever ruling on the issue. Nope, according to the AP this was a “partisan clash”.


158 posted on 06/26/2014 1:38:06 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

Democrats seem to think that every time a congressman goes to the White House Restroom, then it’s OK to appoint far left radicals to positions of higher power.


160 posted on 06/26/2014 3:02:23 PM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

And how many divisions does the Supreme Court have?


161 posted on 06/26/2014 4:54:56 PM PDT by Old Sarge (TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...




Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here
162 posted on 06/26/2014 6:28:59 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad
Perhaps ? the Supreme Court is saying to Congress ? Impeach Obama and the Supreme Court will have Congress's back.

The Supreme Court in a indirect way is saying to Congress " Impeach Obama, he has went beyond his constitutional authority "
166 posted on 06/26/2014 8:36:36 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

The preezy’s power to make recess appointments hasn’t been “limited.” He can still make all the recess appointments he wants. The decision only says he can’t decide when congress is/isn’t in recess. A lot of high-fiving for not a whole lot.


170 posted on 06/26/2014 10:17:04 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

I can’t for the life of me figure out why coal mines and large corporations aren’t simply ignoring Obama’s illegal rulings. Just say no!


171 posted on 06/26/2014 10:25:56 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

Like the King will listen to the SOCUS.....


173 posted on 06/27/2014 5:08:20 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

Our Presidents and some VPs may think they are dictators.....they are not regardless of their Party. We all need to remember that Presidents are not dictators even if they are Democrats.

When a President steps out of line with our Constitution (D/R) they need impeached. They need their axx thrown out by the people, because then they will respect the people.


175 posted on 06/27/2014 6:22:43 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Global corporatism is the threat to freedom and rights. They want your sovereignty and politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: navysealdad

And then The Supremes said "don't do it again".

176 posted on 06/28/2014 11:40:15 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson