Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jiggyboy

And now that I re-read the article carefully, I remember that “impeachment” is not the same as removing him from office. They’re not saying anything at all about that.


16 posted on 06/27/2014 6:36:36 AM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: jiggyboy

Impeachment is the House, which you could think of as being like a grand jury, and the actual trial occurrs in the Senate where a conviction might be obtained, as I recall.


20 posted on 06/27/2014 6:38:14 AM PDT by Fido969 (What's sad is most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jiggyboy

The pressitudes, Journ-0-Lists, lame stream media, driveby media, democratic party spokesmen; whatever you call them, are going to try to get any and all Republican/TEA party/Conservatives to admit that the COULD impeach for actual reasons (called High Crimes and Misdemeanors) and then extrapolate from there, to wit:

“Candidate Such-and-such, running for democrat Senator So-and-so’s seat in X state, today said he backs impeachment against President Obama.” Followed by some archive tape of some Klansman marching, skin head/neo-Nazis/white supremacists doing whatever they do. Followed by direct quote from Elijah Cummings or Hank Johnson or Sheila Jacskon-Lee, “Frankly, we saw this day coming for the first Black president in our history. They could not let him go unchallenged, such is their hatred.”


64 posted on 06/27/2014 7:29:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson