Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2014 6:30:13 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife

They’ve even lost Wallbanger!
He actually said he would not vote for Thad, much to the dismay of the great triangulator Dick Morris.
For the GOPe to lose a shill like Wallbanger indicates to me that they have really stepped in it...


2 posted on 06/27/2014 6:39:49 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Freepers aren't booing -- they're yelling "Cruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuz")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; xzins; wmfights
The Republican Party has made it crystal clear that they look upon the average citizen with contempt. The Democrats are correct that the Republican Party is the party of the rich. Of Course the Democrats are no better, as they represent the government employees unions and despise hard working Americans.

Both parties are despicable.

The Founders never wanted political parties for the reason that political parties tend to be corrupt.

We need to clean house.

If McDaniel does not win a new election, then we will need to foster a write in campaign or in the alternative to support his opponent who is a pro-life, pro-gun candidate who voted against Obamacare.

However if we support him we have to ensure that everyone knows that we support him because of his efforts as a Congressman to go against the grain and not because we accept his views on other subjects.

I would suggest we start an organization such as "Reagan Republicans for Travis Childers."

Perhaps he would be more beholden to us peasants if he knew the only reason he won was because of "Reagan Republicans."

Either way we must make damn sure that Thad Cochran is not re-elected and is never again elected to anything. Thad Cochran is a low life scum sucking power hungry pig.

I could think of some other words, but the mods would pull my post.

3 posted on 06/27/2014 6:51:22 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

John Fund used to be as establishment as it got.


4 posted on 06/27/2014 6:57:00 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I am no friend to the RINO/Establishment; and was furious enough to say Cochran should be politically fought against in November; but what if the following is true?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/17/black-democrats-thad-cochran-_n_5504751.html

What if it was just a Demorat strategy, run by Demorats with no knowledge by Rino's or Chochran?

If there were participation by RINO's and/or Chochran, I can see feeling the same way as I did before; but if it was not?

8 posted on 06/27/2014 7:13:01 AM PDT by celmak (Darn, forgot the c again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Here is a way we can fight back:

Grab a pen, a pair of scissors and some tape.

Take one of those flyers and alter it so it looks like this:

Who says freepers aren't green?

This is how to RECYCLE.

9 posted on 06/27/2014 7:14:09 AM PDT by red-dawg (<<< click for info on my book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The context for all this blow-back gets lost in the shouting. Hannity was carping about the tactics with Dick Morris, last night, while Morris (who "supported" McDaniel, just ask him) taunted back, suggesting Hannity "grow up."

Here's the context, and the problem. Democrats determined the Republican nominee, over and above the fact that a majority of Republicans supported McDaniel. - That's just wrong, and it's a foreshadowing of the early presidential primaries.

The only legal matter to be determined is what percentage of registered Democrats voting for Cochran in the run-off voted in the Democrat primary. As of last night, McDaniel said they had already found over a thousand. This is not an insignificant number, but the argument over tactics and the outrage clouds this issue.

Democrats should not be picking the nominees of the Republican party.

10 posted on 06/27/2014 7:14:40 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I take it all back. After reading the HP article again; it does say a “conservative PAC” worked with the Demorats.


12 posted on 06/27/2014 7:15:50 AM PDT by celmak (Darn, forgot the c again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I no longer think that a Republican majority in the US Senate would be a good thing. In the HOR, fine, they've got a decent percentage of pro-US constitutional conservatives to move forward in positive ways. But in the US Senate, with McCain, Cochran, Flake, Collins, Ayotte, Murkowski (the list goes on) it would be a disaster if they controlled a majority of anything.

How can the RINO backstabbers make it right? Withdraw Cochran and declare McDaniels the nominee.

They've gone too far. The vast majority of constitutional conservatives ARE NOT racists. For heaven's sake, we're the ones that want to stop the genocide of blacks through abortion and to employ US citizen blacks instead of hispanic invaders.

I'm beyound disgusted. The establishment 'pubs in the US Senate are no longer the "lesser of two evils".

30 posted on 06/27/2014 8:06:40 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson