The question of whether Ms. Dahlberg is suffering a continuing injury is a close one, because it is not clear when Ms. Dahlberg’s magazines are likely to need replacement and whether, at that indeterminate point in future, she will desire to replace them with magazines of similar type. Notwithstanding her current interests, with the passage of time, Ms. Dahlberg’s desire to carry large-capacity magazines may change If that happened, this statute would not affect her.
No judge she's not going to change her mind being a plaintiff in this lawsuit and all that.
That is extremely tortured, but confirms the fact that a stronger case should have been made. However, the problem is apparently that no-one has yet been injured, and it .
00is quite common for judges to require an actual ‘injury’, not an expectation that there might be one in the future. Now if someone could show they were wounded while defending themselves because they ran out of ammo in their too-small magazines........