[Viennacon]

This would effectively end unions.

But will the court try to ‘balance out’ its two conservative decisions with two liberal ones? This and Hobby Lobby?

We all know the Roberts court cares about its ‘reputation’ more than the constitution.

[Pining_4_TX]

I still think Roberts is being blackmailed.

[sarasmom]

It would only effectively end government unions.
Which were “allowed” by an executive order of JFK.

That would be a good thing.

[CyberAnt]

The faster and the sooner the better.

The unions are the ones who are stopping employees from ever being fired .. even those who commit crimes are not allowed to be fired. This is the major problem with the IRS situation. All this corruption and crime and nobody can be fired.

NO WONDER NOTHING IS EVER ABLE TO CHANGE. We have the same employees in the govt .. and we cannot get rid of them even when they lie and cheat and steal from the taxpayer.

This has been my major complaint for years and years.

The law should be - NO UNIONS IN ANY PUBLIC SECTOR.

If businesses want to put up with the foolishness of unions, then they can pay the price.

And .. why should there be a special group within govt that GATHERS FUNDS FOR DEMOCRATS.

I used to work in Silicon Valley .. when it was UNION FREE. That’s when all the tech companies had their boom. I don’t know what happened, but initially the companies were exceeding the benefits the unions could provide. When that changed, Silicon Valley practically ended. I remember what it was like to have the unions always standing outside our parking entry .. handing us fliers and such.

I was against the unions then .. and I’m still against them today. Years ago, when employers treated their employees very badly, the unions did a great job of straightening that out .. but then they realized they had a gold mine (and so did the dems), and the race was on to unionize everything possible.

TIME FOR IT TO END. When that happens, it will be the end of the dem party’s power in this country. That can only be a good thing.

[X-spurt]

Don’t necessarily speak for me. Neither I nor you know when you say “the Roberts court cares about its ‘reputation’ more than the constitution” is anything more than your opinion.

Constitutional politics is not checkers, we don’t know what “poison pill” Roberts may have subvertly injected into nobamacare. I suspect his apparent favorable ruling will open up at minimum the “Origination” Clause and considering the dems failed to write in any separation, when one leg goes, so do all.