Are you that obtuse? - I stated that Mississippi law does not allow it. I was right, you were wrong.
Everything else you are saying has no relevance to that fact.
There is a law. That law stands unless and until it is overturned. It has not been overturned. The law exists, as I stated, and you foolishly challenged.
Your post #119 is nonsense - it supports a claim that the EXISTING law will be overturned, but that is already. It, in fact, PROVES my statement, that such a law does exist.
The law matters, if it did not exist, there would be no need for an injunction.
The federal rulings do NOT invalidate the law. The law must be challenged, and a ruling made, to invalidate it. That has not been done.
So the fact that MS has a law is what you say is important?
How would you think that MS enforces the law that requires a voter cannot vote for one nominee in the primary and a different nominee in the general? There’s a law you know. How can it be enforced?
You won’t answer will you?
You won’t answer because it’s a law that is useless.
MS has laws that are useless; they don’t matter.
You can say there are laws in MS but many of them don’t matter. They are just ‘nice thoughts’.
Even when it is shown to you that federal rulings invalidate such laws you still cling to it because?
Stubbornness is not a good trait.
Go ahead and get hot under the collar while others sit back and enjoy watching you spin yourself silly.
McDaniel can run as an independent and he can run as a write-in, whichever way he chooses. But right now he is on a path to overturn what happened last week and for good reason. The fraud is thick. He likely won’t need to run as an independent or as a write-in but if he needs to he will be able to.