Skip to comments.SCOTUSBlog Confused For SCOTUS By Angry Tweeters
Posted on 06/30/2014 8:12:50 PM PDT by tellw
The Supreme Courts decision Monday (June 30) freeing the Hobby Lobby crafts store from having to comply with an Obamacare mandate requiring that it make certain types of birth control available as part of its healthcare plan is drawing a lot of praise from the right and scorn from the the left.
Perhaps one of the most entertaining consequences of the ruling is the sideshow that has been the Twitter feed of one of the medias most trusted Supreme Court observers, SCOTUSBlog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog).
While were sure much of the left understands that there is a difference between SCOTUSBlog and SCOTUS, the people who do not understand the difference were quite comical today as they scolded the news organization for something it did not have anything part in.
Perhaps the most entertaining was SCOTUSBlogs response to all of the angry tweets directed its way by people who mistakingly thought Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (age 81), Antonin Scalia (age 78), Anthony Kennedy (age 77), and Stephen Breyer (age 75) were blogging.
The following are a sampling of the tweets and responses from the esteemed SCOTUSBlog to the moronic masses:
(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...
hahaha. stupid leftists
No joy in TwitLand.
Ignorant & ill-informed as well.
Why aren’t the Rats upset over the ten thousand companies who have been granted a complete exclusion from Obamacare, solely because of... well, because Obama says so? Aren’t they upset all those people won’t receive the full benefits of this wonderful law?
And while we’re at it, how in creation are all those exclusions even remotely legal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.