Men need to be at his wife’s shoulders, there is no need to ‘catch’ the baby. There’s some normal but unappetizing stuff going on.
And a lot of healing after. If the dad needs to be the first holder, fine, but let the doctor/nurse hand the baby right over the mother’s right thigh.
Men tend to view their wive’s parts as their own, and the temporary dislocation of that ‘part’ is not helpful to their view. Not only that, birthing mothers may yearn for Mother’s and Sister’s help... who will have no sexual impact on the delivery for the mom and dad later.
That stuff you describe is real enough but y’all worry too much
It did not pale my desires for her any at all....and I was at the delivery every time
Guys that worry about the cooch looking gross or stretched...are just self centered immature turds that women ought not marry anyhow
Its like myself ...the reverse....from wounds and accidents and surgeries I probably have....no exaggeration....over 150-200 stitches and resultant scarring on my chest...and face....and hideous varicose veins and scars on one leg from an MC wreck
I don’t think my Rib would ever have looked at me and said “oh you’re gross now I’m not feeling much carnal urges for you anymore....I’m going shopping instead”
No way....and I would sure have never diminished her sex appeal from witnessing all these births up close
Men get accused of that a lot....I think only sissy guys like the kind grossed out by menstruation and stuff are that picky about some dreamy Raphaelite vulva
Man..I mean to reject your woman after she just birthed your child cause she’s now. ...not anatomically pristine would be very cruel and frowned on by God
I don’t think its in the Bible per se but it ought to be
Even my fighter pilot dad was in delivery room 56 years ago....he almost fainted...lol