The reason for opposing the fence is that it is a rationalization that is in effect throwing money rather than solving the problem.
absent the will to stop the flow, a fence will merely be an excuse for greater inaction
fences make it harder to cross whether a politician has his heart into enforcement or not.
“The reason for opposing the fence is that it is a rationalization that is in effect throwing money rather than solving the problem.”
Then you answer my question too, why is the California fence working? Again, if you can’t you’re either trolling or have some personal interest in open borders (and I know at least one person on this site has a personal interest in not having a fence).
And while the inaction takes place, thousands upon thousands are kept out by its mere existence. So again, why is that bad? Without it now you get worse than inaction. you get action helping them come and nothing AT ALL stopping them.