Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Says She Had ‘Obligation’ to Defend Accused Rapist
ABCNews ^
| July 7, 2014
| Liz Kreutz
Posted on 07/07/2014 7:42:13 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
07/07/2014 7:42:13 PM PDT
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
She had an obligation to enjoy doing it, too.
2
posted on
07/07/2014 7:43:08 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: Steelfish
Hillary Clinton Says She Had Obligation to Defend Accused Rapist
Is she talking about her husband Bill?
To: Steelfish
Was it “rape, rape” like Whoopi would say?
4
posted on
07/07/2014 7:45:49 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: Steelfish
That is part of the justice system. But ridiculing what a 12 year old girl went through is unbecoming.
5
posted on
07/07/2014 7:46:05 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: Steelfish
“If you’re explaining, you’re losing.”
Poor Hil-liar-y. In the twilight of life a life of lies and scandals from which there is no escape.
Too bad.
6
posted on
07/07/2014 7:46:28 PM PDT
by
Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
("There's always free cheese in a mousetrap." - Marine Col. Peter Martinow)
To: Steelfish
7
posted on
07/07/2014 7:48:39 PM PDT
by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
To: Steelfish
Only in the twisted mind of a sociopath would you have an obligation to defend your rapist husband.
A couple? A couple of sick, twisted, POS criminals.
R.I.H.Cs.
8
posted on
07/07/2014 7:48:47 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: minnesota_bound; MeshugeMikey; All
What were Mrs. Bill Clinton’s “obligations” toward Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and the Benghazi Four?
Lemme see now, - - - it might be in her latest book in the Chapter entitled “Murder, she wrote?”
9
posted on
07/07/2014 7:51:30 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Steelfish
She didn’t have an obligation to lie in court, however, which is what she did.
10
posted on
07/07/2014 7:51:38 PM PDT
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Steelfish
Is there evidence she tried to get out of the case? That’s just the kind of little lie the Clintons like to throw in.
12
posted on
07/07/2014 7:54:18 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: Steelfish
I don’t agree with her premise that she had an obligation to defend the creep. But even if we put that aside — did she have an obligation to find a loophole and get evidence thrown out even when she knew he was guilty? Do lawyers have THAT obligation?
To: Steelfish
She married a rapist. Why wouldn’t she defend one?
14
posted on
07/07/2014 8:22:34 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: Steelfish
15
posted on
07/07/2014 8:30:21 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Wikipedia is wrong. who knew?)
To: Steelfish
And the cackle was compulsory. She is a cackling crank with cankles.
16
posted on
07/07/2014 8:31:33 PM PDT
by
Thickman
(Obama - President Ubiquitous (a.k.a. P.U.))
To: Thickman
17
posted on
07/07/2014 8:37:35 PM PDT
by
ogen hal
(First amendment or reeducation camp)
To: Steelfish
I was a Prosecutor for 25 years. I loathe the Hildabeast. She is correct.
To: Steelfish
I asked to be relieved of that responsibility, but I was not... One suspects yet another whopper to be added to the Hillary Clinton Mountain of Whoppers collection.
One thing seems clear regarding Ms. Clinton.
She is wholly untroubled by that conscience thingy.
.
19
posted on
07/07/2014 9:03:17 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: RIghtwardHo
I was a Prosecutor for 25 years. I loathe the Hildabeast. She is correct. Did you notice that she is being "correct" about the wrong issue? Nobody is saying she shouldn't have defended the rapist. The issue at hand is what vile psychological rape she did to the twelve year old girl in order to defend him, and how she found it funny afterwards.
Is that "correct," too? Especially for someone who craves the power of the presidency with psychotic levels of obsession?
20
posted on
07/07/2014 9:14:20 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson