Hillary Clinton Says She Had ‘Obligation’ to Defend Accused Rapist

ABCNews ^ | July 7, 2014 | Liz Kreutz

[leapfrog0202]

Funny how her story is changing. I wonder if she knows HOW to tell the truth any longer.

Here’s an article where she said she took the case as a favor to a friend:

“The prosecutor called me a few years ago, he said he had a guy who had been accused of rape, and the guy wanted a woman lawyer,” said Clinton in the interview. “Would I do it as a favor for him?” - See more at: http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/89075990753/new-hillary-clinton-tapes-reveal-she-defended-child#sthash.KMOrizI3.dpuf

[bjorn14]

Hillary wasn’t obligated to do anything. She did it as a favor for one of her law partners. She lies again.

[Amagi]

The Smartest Woman in the World completely misses the point of why subsequent cackling over her professional victory in defense of a heinous crime is devastatingly bad publicity.

[Lib-Lickers 2]

she said years ago on audio tape that she took the case as a “favor”(a favor can be turned down especially if it goes against your core values of protecting women’s and victim’s rights).. evidently the favor was far more important than her phony war on women issues..

there was nothing said or hinted at by her in that very detailed conversation of that case about her asking to get out of it, it being an obligation or a direct order..

If she is made to tell the truth when she campaigns for President she’ll have to go all around the country saying “I’ll fight to protect all of you women and your rights UNLESS the man who victimizes you(like my husband or the little girl rapist) needs a favor of me.. then I’m going to ruin you instead..

[MeshugeMikey]

her confusion....has over the years...been compounded by her choice of friends and associates

[blaveda]

Murder, she wrote?” Now that’s a more accurate title for the Harridan’s mendacious tome.