[what's up]

This info was out years ago.

The general consensus was that the sarin was too old for Saddam to use.

[morphing libertarian]

Why are we getting a story now?

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

This info was out years ago. The general consensus was that the sarin was too old for Saddam to use.

But Saddam wasn't going to pile it in a van around a car bomb.

The Viet Cong had their women dismantle and remove explosives from unexploded American bombs and use it in making improvised anti-personnel mines.

[justa-hairyape]

The general consensus was that the sarin was too old for Saddam to use.

Actually we have no idea even what was in the facility we bombed. At least one of the bunkers were too dangerous to enter. All we could do was use a remote controlled camera device to record what could be seen. No samples of the actual rocket artillery shells were taken for analysis, but active WMD chemicals tested positive within the bunker. The total number of artillery shells were estimated. They could not even see all the equipment in that bunker from the camera. So in this case, a consensus is worthless.