Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin's 'Special Difficulty' Solved?
Institute for Creation Research ^ | 7-7-14 | Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D.

Posted on 07/10/2014 8:44:39 AM PDT by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: schaef21
the frauds involved in the so-called “human evolution” series.

Piltdown Man was a good one.

Darwin Theory is Proved True

81 posted on 07/14/2014 7:56:04 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sakic; Ethan Clive Osgoode

***You are pointing me to a site that believes the planet is 6,000 years old and offering it up as science?***

That’s what you’ve got, huh? Don’t bother to read the articles.... you might get a different perspective.


82 posted on 07/14/2014 8:01:39 AM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

***Piltdown Man was a good one. ***

Although this wasn’t a true hoax..... my favorite was Ardepithicus Ramidus Kadabba. In 2001, Time Magazine featured him on the front cover and had a seven page article on the inside.

Very prominently displayed was a toe bone with the caption: “This toe bone proves the creature walked on two legs.”

When you get to the last page of the article you find out that the toe bone was found 10 miles away from the rest of the fossil and that by their dating methods it was 300,000 years older.

They see what they want to see...... “Evolution is true, now let’s look at the evidence.”


83 posted on 07/14/2014 10:26:31 AM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: schaef21

Are you denying that that site is a young Earth proponent?

You want to debate science and fact with them as your experts?

Next, we should add witch doctors as experts.


84 posted on 07/14/2014 12:09:56 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sakic; Ethan Clive Osgoode

***Are you denying that that site is a young Earth proponent? You want to debate science and fact with them as your experts? Next, we should add witch doctors as experts.***

Very cute. I am not denying that they are young earth proponents, I am one myself.

Are you denying that most of the authors of these articles hold PhDs? Are you saying that their PhDs are invalid because after evaluating the evidence they disagree with you?

There is plenty of evidence available that would support the young earth view.... they have that evidence on their website. It is your prerogative to disagree... that’s totally fine.

Dismissing them out-of-hand, though, is what your side of the argument does. Easier to do that than to deal with their arguments.

You wouldn’t have read their stuff even if they were old-earthers would you, sakic?

Nice talkin’ to you.


85 posted on 07/14/2014 2:30:25 PM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: schaef21

There are people with PHDs out there with all sorts of beliefs you would ridicule, but I guess that is proof enough for you.


86 posted on 07/15/2014 5:42:28 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson