Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators debate Russian-Afghan helicopter contract
thehill.com ^ | July 10, 2014 | Kristina Wong

Posted on 07/10/2014 7:34:16 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Russia from supplying some 30 helicopters to Afghanistan's air force.

The Pentagon has a $553.8 million contract with Russian arms supplier Rosoboronexport to provide the Mi-17 transport helicopters to Afghan forces. U.S. forces are currently training the Afghan air force on the aircraft.

However, there are bipartisan proposals in both the House and Senate to curtail that contract, with lawmakers arguing that continuing the contract benefits Russia even as it takes aggressive moves in Ukraine.

During a hearing on the nomination of top military officials, Inhofe questioned Army Gen. John Campbell, the president's pick for U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, on whether the program should be ended. "If we had to change the Mi-17...we'd be several years behind and we'd have to start a whole new training program," Campbell said.

"I hope that all the members of the committee heard you loud and clear," said Inhofe, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Sens. Dan Coats (R-Ind.), John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) are proposing that the U.S. send American-made helicopters instead.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), who supports ending the contract, accused the Pentagon of refusing “to listen to any other suggestions about it.”

“Now we have Russia invading the Crimea ... so I’m not very personally pleased with that decision," he said.

Pentagon officials say the Russian-made helicopters are better suited for Afghanistan's thin altitude and rugged terrain, and are easier to operate than U.S.-made helicopters.

Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said the committee received a letter from current U.S. and NATO commander Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford two weeks ago, outlining the "catastrophic effect" on the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan.

"Any loss of Afghan National Security Force operational reach would degrade force protection [for U.S. troops]," King said.

"I would agree with Gen. Dunford's assessment," Campbell said, adding that if the contract was ended, it would immediately cut off spare parts and ground the entire Mi-17 fleet.

"[In] six months to 12 months, it would become combat ineffective," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: jamesinhofe; jeffsessions

1 posted on 07/10/2014 7:34:16 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Giving American equipment to those people would be like giving Swiss watches to baboons. In 30 days not a single one would be flying.


2 posted on 07/10/2014 7:38:26 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

we paid with blood so Russia could make good arms deals. that makes sense.


3 posted on 07/10/2014 7:55:25 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson