Skip to comments.Huckabee, Perry and Romney look like they are running in 2016
Posted on 07/15/2014 6:45:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Last month, I was very happy to hear that Mitt Romney was considering another run. Frankly, I think that he is one of the most qualified people ever denied the presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
So much suckage.
Mitt Romney, ah yes, the loser .
He lost .
He is a loser.
Oh yeah, loser.
I held my nose and voted for Romney over Obama. I just couldn’t do that again after what Obamacare is to my family.
I am done with the Republican party. They keep force-feeding carp.
wonderful, another RINO-fest. The GOP-e will never learn that the majority of the base and all of the conservatives DO NOT WANT these RINO pos candidates to represent us.
I believe Perry is definitely in. Not sure about Huckabee and Romney yet. Huckabee is is sniffing around the edges. If Hickabee decides to get in, you will know it if he starts losing weight inn a hurry. I think Roney will hang around and if the other candidates start to deadlock and there is a Draft Romney movement, he may try again.
Talk about a recipe for a third party.....
Perry is the best among them!
They just want to see which one of them gets to lose to Fauxcahontas.
The only person we need running in 2016 is Ted Cruz. Everyone else is either a RINO or an incompetent campaigner.
Of the three I like Perry best. While not the most polished speaker around . . . who wants a smooth talker . . . hasn’t worked out so great with the teleprompter man we have in there now.
RE: Mitt Romney, ah yes, the loser .
The same could have been said of Richard Nixon in 1960.
He lost to Kennedy ( by a squeaker and many say he should have won had it not been for massive fraud ).
Then he ran for governor in 1962 and LOST AGAIN to Pat Brown.
That would have been the end of his political career.
You know the rest of the story...
Romney would be OK if he toughens up and took the correct lessons away from his loss. I’m doubtful. This election will be all out war.
NO ONE is going ANYWHERE without a firm and succinct stand on the Immigration (translated: Illegal Aliens) issue!!!
As if we’re not hearing enough horror stories at the moment. These losers need to give up. They’re washed-up has-been lapdogs. The GOP-e needs to die.
Agreed. I can think of about a dozen better candidates, but Perry is still miles ahead of the Manchurian Democrat candidate Romney, and the wishy-washy socially womanly Huckabee.
I still like Perry, even after his debate gaffes. I am willing to vote for him again. (I voted Perry in the primaries).
I will not vote for Romney or Huckabee under any circumstances.
Looks like the start of the same bunch that ran last time.
Too bad it wasn't.
No. No. No.
Or at least...
Hell no. Mostly no. And Eff No.
Perry is the Lest Worst among them.
He’s hardly a prize.
ya, those idiots will win it for them..
With out my vote.
You have already been tried and rejected!!
Pack your egos and support a true CONSERVATIVE like Ted Cruz!
RE: NO RETREADS!
Wasn’t Ronald Reagan a retread in 1980?
Sure hope and pray we can do better than that.
I am so, so tired of the GOPe using Iowa and New Hampshire as the street corners for turning out their ‘new’ b!tches.
I’m done with this crap. If Ted Cruz isn’t on my Georgia ballot when the GOPe finally deems I can vote, I won’t be voting. If they thing conservatives will turn out for either, they are tragically mistaken. I’d sooner see the GOPe and the Republican Party they control burn to the ground (figuratively).
Ok, let me rephrase that.
NO RETREADS THAT SUCK!
Ya....help the libs stay in power....
That’ll teach ‘em a lesson, and then in about a million years your third party favorite can fix everything.
Texas should be the first primary, and anyone who doesn’t finish in the Top Three, has to drop out.
Nope, in 1980 RR was a tire with a GOOD MANY miles remaining on his tread.
There were, are, retreads and there are retards (intentional). Ronald Reagan was a visionary who would not give up because of his love of country.
Mitt Romney is a retard who won’t give up because he hasn’t appeased enough, and people just don’t love him enough. Frankly, the GOPe has NOTHING - nothing in their tool bag except a bunch of ‘tools.’
I held my nose for McInsane, and I held my nose for Romney. I won’t be holding my nose this time. The GOPe has to be destroyed.
I agree. Anywhere but IOWA (breadbasket of bribes and ethanol) and New Hampshire. What are they combined? 5% of the population? Whatever they are, they’ve done us conservatives a HUGE disservice.
The retardation of the GOP continues.
Let em run! The more the merrier! Let get some new faces—West, Lee, Walker, even Trump. Now these old dudes are really running for VP. If any of them gets their act together and really fights—I will support them.
Huckleberry and Willard? Nope. Put them in the same column as Jeb and Krispie Kreme.
No, no thank you, and HELL NO!
To have so many candidates running makes the entire thing a huge farce.
There, fixed it for you. No lefty, liberal, progressive, pro-death, anti-gun RINOs.
No one mentioned is even in the same league, state, nation, or universe with RWR!
Total nonsense, Romney has a single victory to show for his entire decades old political career, he failed in that office and gave up running for reelection and left with 34% approval.
Navy Lt. Commander Richard Nixon came out of WWII and became a two term Congressman, sworn in one year after resigning his Navy commission.
Congressman Nixon later won office as a united States Senator, and then served as a two term Vice President of the United States as veep he ran for and lost that 1960 presidential election by only thousands of votes.
Mitt Romney is a true loser, with almost nothing to show for decades of campaigning, except that one lonely, less than 50% election win which ended in failure, his having to give up his plan for reelection, and losing the seat to democrats after his having been the 4th GOP governor in a row.
Not a single one of them will challenge the legitimacy of so-called “moderate” Islam or its current representation in the WH and the Executive Branch of govt. Not a one has mentioned the recent establishment and announcements of the newly formed Muslim political party, the USMCO, the US Muslim Council of Organisations, designed to immediately focus on the 2016 election as a voting block.
Valerie Jarrett is thought to be a potential Dem candidate waiting in the wings, certainly a major Muslim Brotherhood associate. The Muslim Brotherhood has had the last two presidents “covered” (Saudi Royal Presidential gold medallions speak for themselves) and will go for another, regardless of whether he/she is a Dem or Republican.
The influence of the Muslim Brotherhood on US foreign policy and internal matters is massive and should be a major election issue. If the media are a fourth estate, the MB is a fifth estate thru its US organisations, now organized for formal political functioning at the highest levels of government and politics in the US.
Here is a link to the USMCO’s nature and recent announcements since March 2012 and before:
US Muslim Brotherhood Adherents Form New Stealth Jihad Group - US Council Of Muslim Organisations (USCMO)
The Muslim Brotherhood, linked strongly in a publicly perceived sense since the Cairo Speech, vetted by MB advisors has had increasing influence on US foreign policy in the ME, especially in Syira, Libya and with HAMAS, sprung itsef, as Al Q, from the MB. The US in Syria risks a Al Q replacement for Assad in Syria and if the IS Caliphate relinks with Al-Q there will be vastly more trouble. Boko Haram and a significant element of the Pakistan Taliban have come out for the IS Caliphate.
Another political party has formed to influence US policy to an even greater extent than it does already, and neither party recognises the threat or is addressing it. Both parties would rather attack the Tea Party. The Muslim Brotherhood would like to keep it that way.
The Muslim Brotherhood has NO resistance offered by either party to its anti-American goals. How come?
Here are a couple of links regarding the USMCO and its member organisations
Not an endorsement, but I really want to see Walker run, think he would be very good to have in the mix as a viable contender.
Or is he too damaged now as a result of those manufactured scandals?
Palin, Cruz, or LOSE.
How about Scott Walker?
Reagan wasn’t a retread, he was a political force and the true earned leader of the conservatives in America, while to this day no one knows why Romney is even in politics.
In 1976 Governor Reagan was only months out of his second term as Governor of California, and he almost knocked off a SITTING GOP president as the counting went on after midnight “Ford prevailed with 1,187 delegates to Reagan’s 1,070”. In 1980 he did defeat a sitting president.
It was during the 1980 campaign that Romney left the GOP, eventually to become a democrat supporter, fund raiser, and even voter.
“Last month, I was very happy to hear that Mitt Romney was considering another run.”
Why is there no BARF alert?!?