Skip to comments.Elizabeth Warren Supporters Launch ‘Ready for Warren’
Posted on 07/16/2014 7:28:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Youve heard of Ready for Hillary, but now theres Ready for Warren.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has said over and over that she will not run for president in 2016, but that isnt stopping her fans from encouraging her to run.
A group of activists has launched the Ready for Warren campaign, asking people to sign a petition urging the Massachusetts Democrat to pursue a presidential bid. We are Ready for Elizabeth Warren to run for President in 2016, a statement on the website reads. Warren is the backbone that the Democratic Party too often forgets it needs. Warren has inspired a movement yet to jump into the race for president, we need to show Warren that shes got support all across the country, from Oklahoma to Massachusetts, from Florida to Nevada. We know that Warren can win, but its up to all of us to make it happen.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Clinton/Warren 2016. Beware!
First Obama, now Fauxcahontas.
I’ve heard that there are big numbers of Democrats who are not in love with the Clintons, and don’t want to see the Clintons run again.
Frankly, some liberals don’t think the Clintons are liberal enough for them.
Some also see Hillary as blocking other presidential contenders for the next 10 years. Reason being, if HIllary runs and wins in 2016, then she runs for re-election in 2020. That means that the next time the Democrat nomination would be open would be in 2024, ten years from now, if Hillary runs in 2016. And some liberals don’t want to see that happen.
Some liberals think that the Clintons would not continue the liberal policies of Obama, and will not build upon them. Bottom line, the Clintons just aren’t liberal and radical enough to suit them. The Democrats have become increasingly left wing in recent decades. Hillary may not do it for them the way an Elizabeth Warren will make Chris Mathews tingle.
This lying, no good bitch is a millionaire who’s popular with half this nation.
Think about that while you’re job hunting. :)
I'd move to Cuba. What difference at that point would it make?
This is what made my Aunt leave the Democrap party, all the party pushes now are far left loons. Hopefully other life long Democraps are getting wise as well but she’s in her 70s though and remembers when Democraps use to be middle of the road. For the younger Democraps though, they don’t remember that and that may be a problem. For them, supporting terror, treason and communism seems perfectly normal.
"Ready for Warren" = "Freaks for Fauxcahontas"
Warren is an air head sock puppet of the financial oligarchy. How conservatives can take her seriously is beyond me. Ben Carson, period.
A few months ago I suggested the Warren/Castro ticket to a group of commies.
They all agreed it would be an unbeatable combination.
They've donned their war paint, have they?
If that ever happened and they won, absolutely no doubt whatsoever we would have a Civil war. It would be impossible to avoid, it’s either that or people lose everything and I for one do not want to live in the street picking through garbage.
RE: Warren is an air head sock puppet of the financial oligarchy. How conservatives can take her seriously is beyond me.
It isn’t conservatives in this country that are the problem... consider this — Nearly HALF of this country is dependent on welfare and we might already have crossed the 50% threshold.
THESE are the people who will be attracted to Warren’s message.
As Rush Limbaugh used to say : “It’s very hard to fight Santa Claus”
Frankly, some liberals dont think the Clintons are liberal enough for them.
I don't think it is the fact that the Clintons are not liberal enough. They bring a lot of baggage, and seem obsessed with power. The dems love a winner though, and will support her if they think she's the only chance for a winner, even if they find her off-putting. I think 2016 will shape up like 2008. Hillary will look like the shoo-in early on. Someone else will give it a shot. If it looks like he or she has a chance of beating Hillary, then a lot of 'rats will jump ship and follow the challenger. If the challenger can't show enough promise, they'll stick with Hillary.
It looks good...........
RE: Where have we seen this before? A nutty liberal professor, with no credentials or accomplishments to qualify for the highest office in the land,
Voters now want America to be the land of firsts...
The First black President in the Western World.
The First WOMAN President of the Untied States
and the bonus...
The first Native American Indian President of the United States.
What’s not to boast about?
heap bad medicine
Hillary will drop out citing “health issues” and will endorse Warren. Hillary Clinton had a stroke and her health is worse than the media lets on. Also, this gives her a chance to pad her retirement account with “speaking fees” and other forms of money laundering that go into her “charity”. Just watch.
Clinton/Warren 2016. Beware!
They’ll finish the destruction Obama started.
"Ready for Warren" = "Freaks for Fauxcahontas"
"Loons for Lie-A-Watha"...
The difference is that Barack “Present” Obama could mask his extreme progressivism under a veneer of centrism. He had no real record, other than a lot of lofty and generic speeches.
Warren is a completely different story. She’s very much on the record with her progressive extremism. There are REEMS of information, more than enough to build an excellent oppo warroom around.
The question is, will the American voting public buy it? At this point I’m so cynical about them that I can’t say they won’t. The only positive thing is that if Warren is elected President it’ll be an undeniably informed choice by the voters. May they get (good and hard) what they vote for.
Well, in politics, they love a winner. They will overlook Hillary’s flaws, if they perceive she can be a winner.
They would rather have a President Hillary than any GOP president.
Oh great. When this country goes bankrupt she'll be our lawyer.
I think “Fighting for Fauxcahontas” is much catchier than “Ready for Warren.”
Another ignorant, self-serving, unethical, Marxist Harvard graduate. Just what we need after 8 years of Obama.
The fruits of Warren's intellectual achievement:
I always thought there was a sizable anti-Clinton faction in the Democratic Party and I guess this confirms it.
RE: Fighting for Fauxcahontas
LOVIN’ LIAWATHA !
The democrats know their only hopes now are “firsts.” First black president. First all gay all the time president. First woman president. After Warren, firstgay president. First illegal immigrant president. First transgendered president. All statist Alinsky disciples.
Liz is a lez and sister of Harry Reid.
Think about it. She is the appitamy.
Same lame attitude and shockingly, she is twin.
If Warren runs the headlines would write themselves:
Warren on warpath to presidency
Republicans circle wagons to defend against Warren
Will Warrens road to White House be trail of tears?
Warren scalps Clintons lead
Warren has heap big lead
Will Warren be next commander in CHIEF?
Warren in pow wow with Democrat leaders
Warren shares peace pipe with Clintons
If she looks at Hillary’s bank account she’ll figure out that all she has to do is “run” and she’ll be able to rake in millions giving speeches. The worse case scenario is she could be Hillary’s secretary of state THEN make millions then run again.
That will never happen.
Clintons want their power back that Obama usurped and Obama wants to remain king of the Rat hill after he leaves office. Warren is the most likely anti-Hillary that would receive Obamas support, as she’s as far left as he is and there aren’t many other choices that could be a viable contender vs. Hillary.
Even Obama is smart enough not to even think about Biden for 2016.
My sisters in Ohio, who are conservative in their family life and finances, are chomping at the bit to vote for Hillary or Warren. Identity politics, where issues and policy does not matter. The old "men have screwed things up for over 200 years" routine.
Does this liar refer to her self as a squaw?
Ben Carson is anti-gun and for open borders.
He has zero chance.
Now, the question is--is she on board with the bankers? Or not. She likes to talk a good game like she isn't.
It'll be really easy to figure out. If she is still vertical come 2015 or so--she is on board with the bankers.
RE: Now, the question is—is she on board with the bankers? Or not.
In my experience, bankers or wall street executives give money to BOTH parties.
They consider this a small price to pay ( tribute money ) to gain favor with whoever is in power.
“Clinton/Warren 2016. Beware!”
With our economy leaking GDP, those two Commies would stick their finger in the Dyke.
Hey, that could be their campaign slogan?
Crackpots for Crockajawea?
So they would be sticking their fingers in each other???? (sorry couldn't resist...)
“With Hillary leaking support, will Warren stick her finger in the Dyke?”
No, I'm not kidding about the investigated and arrested comment.
The little Dutch boy saved the Dike, not a Dyke.
The joke was intended.
I am speaking of the international financiers.
Much is made of Hillary’s age in 2016. Warren is only 2 years her junior. She should be around 67 in 2016.