Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bray
That’s like saying we had control of the terrorists who attacked Benghazi.

I'm not sure that is as far-fetched as you think.

Just WHAT was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi, anyway? The Embassy was hundreds of miles away in Tripoli. Qaddafy had thousands of weapons, including shoulder-launched MANPADS. And to Obama, getting weapons into the hands of Syrian rebels was a top priority. Was it possible Stevens was being set up? Would his capture and subsequent release make Obama look good for the election? And what is SO important about Benghazi that they had to lie, lie & lie, even with us watching incredulously 5 days AFTER the attack when Susan Rice came on every Sunday show still blaming the video?

So many unanswered questions. But I wouldn't put anything PAST this regime at this time.

53 posted on 07/20/2014 7:48:46 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

So is Obama asking Putin to have as complete an investigation of the shootdown as he had in Benghazi? Perhaps Putin should blame it on a video and then lose the hard drives.


66 posted on 07/20/2014 8:08:27 AM PDT by bray (Palin/Bibi 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

0bama did not want to send the FBI to Benghazi because the ground was not secure and safe.

0bama wants the FBI on the ground to investigate the crash site two days ago.

Discuss


84 posted on 07/20/2014 8:25:17 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson