Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/22/2014 7:52:27 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Check breaking news



Skip to comments.

Federals Appeals Court Delivers Serious Setback To Obama Health Care Law
Yahoo ^

Posted on 07/22/2014 7:40:56 AM PDT by TigerClaws

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal appeals court delivers serious setback to Obama health care law .

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
That's the entire story. What's up?
1 posted on 07/22/2014 7:40:56 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Huff Po called it “death blow.”

!!


2 posted on 07/22/2014 7:41:23 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Decision just released. The IRS over reached and got slapped. This will eventually end up before SCOTUS


3 posted on 07/22/2014 7:42:35 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

CNBC:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/appeals-court-most-obamacare-subsidies-142125125.html;_ylt=AwrBEiRqeM5THR4A5q3QtDMD

In a potentially crippling blow to Obamacare, a top federal appeals court Tuesday said that billions of dollars worth of government subsidies that helped nearly 5 million people buy insurance on HealthCare.gov are illegal.

A judicial panel in a 2-1 ruling said such subsidies can be granted only to those people who bought insurance in an Obamacare exchange run by an individual state or the District of Columbia - not on the federally run exchange HealthCare.gov


4 posted on 07/22/2014 7:42:47 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

GOOD!

Thanks for posting.

5 posted on 07/22/2014 7:43:42 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Huff Po called it “death blow.”

Lewinsky on the news again?.....................

6 posted on 07/22/2014 7:43:47 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
I noticed you only posted an excerpt. The rest of the article reads:

VIEW COMMENTS
7 posted on 07/22/2014 7:43:55 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws; WildHighlander57; LucyT; maggief

Great news! Guess they should have read it before they passed it!


8 posted on 07/22/2014 7:46:36 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

States rights? In USA? I thought all that supreme law stuff was done away with by the completely new and _modern_ USG.


9 posted on 07/22/2014 7:48:11 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Wow...a Federal Appeals Court....Tough to overturn.


10 posted on 07/22/2014 7:48:14 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
"Section 36B plainly makes subsidies available in the Exchanges established by states," wrote Senior Circuit Judge Raymond Randolph in his majority opinion, where he was joined by Judge Thomas Griffith "We reach this conclusion, frankly, with reluctance. At least until states that wish to can set up their own Exchanges, our ruling will likely have significant consequences both for millions of individuals receiving tax credits through federal Exchanges and for health insurance markets more broadly."

Reluctance!!!?? WTF is that wording??

11 posted on 07/22/2014 7:49:57 AM PDT by Paul46360 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

So true, San Fran Nan just found out part of what’s in it. :-)


12 posted on 07/22/2014 7:50:19 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Something else for the commie lib ‘RATS to whine and moan about. Somebody gonna get da BOYCOTT!!!


13 posted on 07/22/2014 7:51:01 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey-ey, goodbye
Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey-ey, goodbye
Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey-ey, goodbye


14 posted on 07/22/2014 7:51:42 AM PDT by Paul46360 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3183494/posts


15 posted on 07/22/2014 7:52:04 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson