To: cuban leaf
No one is refusing service to anyone based upon their race.
It is the event that goes against the person’s conscience (whatever the event might be), and that is where the right to refuse to provide a particular service should be protected by the Constitution.
In the case of the Colorado Baker, the homosexuals were already customers. He had never refused them service before. It was the EVENT that was the problem, not the customer.
36 posted on
07/23/2014 10:05:27 AM PDT by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: left that other site
No one is refusing service to anyone based upon their race.
Yep. That is basically what I’d say too.
45 posted on
07/23/2014 10:11:56 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: left that other site
In the case of the Colorado Baker, the homosexuals were already customers. He had never refused them service before. It was the EVENT that was the problem, not the customer.
If this is true, they have a very strong case that they were not discriminating against the homosexuals, but the event for which they wanted the cake. Case closed.
46 posted on
07/23/2014 10:13:03 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson