Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
See Distributism.
8 posted on 07/24/2014 4:13:33 AM PDT by matthewrobertolson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: matthewrobertolson
Actually, that makes sense. That principle is much more narrowly focused than a general statement about "property ownership." That Catholic principle is exactly what I had in mind, since it is based on "property" as defined as a means of production. There's a huge difference between "property" as a suburban home with a large mortgage and "property" as an ownership stake in a business, farm, etc.
10 posted on 07/24/2014 4:17:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: matthewrobertolson

Distributism seems to be a wildly optimistic assumption that everybody will be equally competent at managing their share of “the means of production.”
Somehow I doubt it. As my dad used to put it, if everybody started with the same amount of wealth today, in a few years it would be concentrated again in about the same fashion it is now.


20 posted on 07/24/2014 5:46:26 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson