It is hard to believe that this will pass constitutional muster when it finally gets into the federal court system.
But requiring the man to report that his beliefs have been eliminated from his business is not even trying to be subtle.
It’s really quite absurd and judges are on the wrong side.
Also, we need to deliberately hire homosexual signmakers to make signs for our protest rallies . . . and sue them if they discriminate. Just to get the opposite test case on the table.
Shalom.
He will probably lose. Jack entered a contract with several government agencies. He obtained a business license, he pays SSI taxes, etc...
A license is a permit to do that which is otherwise forbidden, and in his entry into the “benefits” of being a good corporate government employee, he’s required to follow the rules they make, however arbitrary they may be.