You were making the case that we have all been trained not to photograph buildings. Implying that any beat down the guy received was understandable.
Look i am not here to crucify you. I just don’t understand why you turned this into a photography issue, and why you appeared to give the gubment the benefit of the doubt. Many of us here are way past excuses for gubment abuse.
That’s all this is about.
I never turned it into a photography issue. It was a journalism issue We don’t know the whole story. The photog was in the story