Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t think the Supreme Court will step into this before an “en banc” hearing.


5 posted on 08/01/2014 2:32:02 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: babygene

I don’t think the Supreme Court will step into this before an “en banc” hearing.
++++
And an en banc hearing would involve a majority of Dem nominated judges. It seems doubtful to me that a Roberts court would be anxious to take up this case if the 3 judge decision is reversed.

I hate to be negative but I am not hopeful this will turn out the way we would like.


7 posted on 08/01/2014 3:11:50 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Why not? Roberts has inoculated himself on this issue, while Kagan has shot herself in the foot.


8 posted on 08/01/2014 3:15:52 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson