Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

Japan was a net importer of food. Starve they would.


125 posted on 08/02/2014 2:30:54 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: xone; PieterCasparzen; Kaslin; Alberta's Child; Pelham; Gay State Conservative; riverdawg; ...
xone: "Japan was a net importer of food. Starve they would."

Not so much.
I can't find direct numbers, but a little bit of math can still get us there...

In 1943, Japan proper had about 73 million citizens, and imported the equivalent of 2 million tons of rice.
That sounds like a lot, right?
But 73 million active people would eat the equivalent of nearly 50 million tons per year, meaning imports supplied only 4% of their needs.
The rest must come from Japan's home grown production.

The loss of two million tons of imported rice would equate to roughly 100 calories per person per day.

So the Japanese would not starve, period.

They had to be defeated, and the only choice other than A-bomb was invasion.
Given their fanatical resistance, invasion would cost hundreds of thousands of Americans plus millions of Japanese.

So our A-bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki were simply the most merciful way possible to end the war, quickly.

137 posted on 08/02/2014 3:58:49 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson