Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

Japan had no capability to mount an amphibious assault against US military installations or the mainland or even Alaska at the point of Okinawa.

It was all over, but the Japanese war lords would not recommend surrender yet.

There was no urgency to any ground invasion.

Japan could have been blockaded at that point and the rest of its air forces and naval forces destroyed.

The ground forces still on islands could have been starved out by blockade over the years, with selective air attacks as opportunities arose.

It would have been long-term but very inexpensive, especially in terms of American lives.


61 posted on 08/02/2014 10:17:35 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: PieterCasparzen

“It would have been long-term but very inexpensive, especially in terms of American lives.”

A long-term fight would have seemed very expensive to the American GIs who were killed or maimed doing the fighting.

The American casualty rate in August 1945 was running 7,000 a week. Just 12 more weeks of war would have generated 84,000 American casualties, about equal to that of Hiroshima alone.

The Japanese fought harder as the war approached the home islands. In Okinawa civilians had been recruited to fight and they committed mass suicide as the island was conquered. American war planners understood that the fight for the home islands would be even more intense and the casualty rate would be even higher.

“There was no urgency to any ground invasion.”

And this is known to you how, exactly?

“Japan could have been blockaded at that point and the rest of its air forces and naval forces destroyed.”

This was the situation at Okinawa. I suggest that you read up on the fight for Okinawa and see how “easy” that went despite the Japanese being cut off from supplies.

“It was all over, but the Japanese war lords would not recommend surrender yet.”

I read an interesting article in the Rafu Shimpo on one of the atomic bomb anniversaries, it might have been the 50th. The day after Hiroshima the Emperor convened his war council. To discuss surrender? Of course not. He wanted to know how soon Japan could have its own bomb to drop on the American invaders.

But the Nagasaki bomb took the air out of this bravado. The Japanese had no idea of how many bombs that we had but figured out that the first one wasn’t a fluke. And that we would keep dropping them until we ran out or reloaded. Fortunately for all involved the Emperor and his warlords saw the light once it appeared to them in the form of mushroom clouds and they surrendered, something unimaginable only days before.


100 posted on 08/02/2014 11:46:46 AM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: PieterCasparzen

So basically it would have been more just to allow millions of Japanese to starve to death, right?


198 posted on 08/03/2014 10:30:43 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson