Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego
Let's just go back and look at it in objective terms.

It's August 2nd of 1945. What facts in place at the time (and I'll give a wide degree of latitude here to include anything from a well-documented historical record as a "fact") made it absolutely imperative for the U.S. to drop atomic bombs on Japanese cities at that point in time?

An analysis based on the presumption that "I must do X to you because the only alternative I have is to accept Y" is a poor line of thought here in a military conflict at that particular juncture.

62 posted on 08/02/2014 10:19:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

What is the alternative to X and Y that I am obviously missing? It seems to me that X was dropping the bombs, which we did, and Y would have been a conventional invasion of Japan. What was Z; what was the other alternative to bring the war to a conclusion?


85 posted on 08/02/2014 11:02:55 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson