[grania]

What parts of this article are you disputing? Be factual and specific, please.

[tcrlaf]

“What parts of this article are you disputing? Be factual and specific, please.”

That should be.... interesting.

[Krosan]

I am challenging the use of Russia Today as a source. Reputation of a news source is one of their most prized possession and Russia Today has absolutely destroyed their reputation with their systematic lying.

I believe dismissing them based on their horrible track record is an acceptable behavior.

[FreeReign]

“When President Viktor Yanukovich was overthrown on February 21, the parliament voted back new powers in terms of going back to the 2004 constitution,” John Laughland from the Institute of Democracy and Cooperation in Paris, told RT. “Now the new president, Poroshenko, discovers that this new constitution doesn’t suit him, he needs to purge the parliament, he needs to stigmatize people who don’t agree with his policies as fifth columnists.”

What part of the "new" (2004) Ukrainian Constitution is Poroshenko objecting to. Laughland makes no mention of that.

Perhaps you can explain. Be factual and specific, please.