Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mad_as_he$$
From the article you linked:
What do these findings mean? First and foremost, Ebola is not suddenly an airborne disease. As expert commentators at ProMED stated, the experiments “demonstrate the susceptibility of pigs to Zaire Ebolavirus and that the virus from infected pigs can be transmitted to macaques under experimental conditions… they fall short of establishing that this is a normal route of transmission in the natural environment.” Furthermore, because human Ebola outbreaks have historically been locally contained, it is unlikely that Ebola can spread between humans via airborne transmission.
Of course, the fear is a new virulent strain of Ebola that could be transmitted airborne or by other means.
35 posted on 08/03/2014 7:18:26 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

The relatively fast spread of the current outbreak means most of what they know about transmission is out the window. Also the patient at Emory was/is suppose to be an expert on ebola. Why have over 100 health care workers - trained and briefed - gotten the disease? Because it has mutated and may well have gone airborne.


37 posted on 08/03/2014 7:28:09 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson