Posted on 08/03/2014 8:04:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
The merit of the federal government adopting use of Gross Output (GO) as a broadened quarterly measure of U.S. economic activity to supplement the traditional reliance on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) shone when the Bureau of Economic Analysis recently published its first-quarter 2014 findings.
The opportunity to compare the numbers shows that the economy may not have been as weak as the 2.1% shrinkage the GDP indicated in the first quarter when winter storms hit. Indeed, second-quarter real GDP rebounded to grow at a 4% annualized rate, affirming Gross Output’s useful role as a measure of economic activity because it is designed to reflect spending at all stages of production, including business-to-business commerce that is missed in the GDP results.
Gross Output dipped by just 0.1% in real terms (after taking price inflation into account) during the first quarter of 2014. That scant dip effectively left GO unchanged at $30,210.6 billion in the first quarter of 2014.
GDP, which measures the final goods and services purchased by consumers, business and government, in contrast was revised down to -2.1% in real terms, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BEA). The BEA previously estimated that first-quarter real GDP dipped 0.7% to fall to $17,016.0 billion.
The GO data indicates the economy is not scuffling as much as the GDP figures suggested in the first quarter, said Mark Skousen, an economist who also is the editor of the Forecasts & Strategies investment newsletter. Skousen, a Presidential Fellow at Chapman University, has advocated publicly for the government to use Gross Output for more than 20 years as a more comprehensive measure of economic activity than GDP.
Skousen proposed Gross Output as a macroeconomic measure in his book, “The Structure of Production,” published by New York University Press in 1990. Starting this year, the Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes GO on a quarterly basis in its “GDP by Industry” data.
The latest economic information shows that the economy has been strengthening in the second quarter. That rebound suggests to me that the GDP numbers in the first quarter may have been misleadingly negative and at risk of giving lawmakers, policymakers and others a flawed measure of U.S. economic activity.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) provided further evidence of a growing economy when it announced on July 30 that economic activity had been picking up in the second quarter.
“Labor market conditions improved, with the unemployment rate declining further, the FOMC reported in a statement. However, other indicators suggest that there is a slow recovery in the housing sector and a significant underutilization of labor, even though household spending appears to be rising moderately and business fixed investment is advancing, the FOMC found.
For those reasons, the FOMC concluded “sufficient underlying strength” exists in the broader economy and unemployment is improving enough to once again scale back its asset purchase program. Beginning in August, the FOMC will add to its holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of just $10 billion per month rather than $15 billion per month, and will add to its holdings of longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $15 billion per month rather than $20 billion per month.
The FOMC is continuing to scale back its easy-money policies, despite the widely varying GDP in the first and second quarters. The risk is that lawmakers, policymakers and others may overreact to the latest economic numbers without vetting them against other data, including the federal government’s recently adopted quarterly gross output statistic.
I don’t believe anything coming out of government. Every agency has been corrupted by leftists.
Right on.
“Hints” at corrupt data from Obama’s government?
RECOVERY SUMMER 6.0!!
(And if you don’t believe it, you are a racist, a homophobe, or even could be an EVIL CHRISTIAN!)
I don’t believe anything coming out of government. Every agency has been corrupted by leftists.
And the GOPe, too.
Even assuming the numbers are correct, down 3.5% in the first quarter, up 4% in the second means we are exactly where we were at the end of last year zero growth.
Here’s a good Sunday read for you.
"We moved our base camp last night and we’re now positioned literally
within feet of the river. Have been sitting here watching the border
patrol patrolling in their riverboats all night and all morning..."~Jim Robinson
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
Figures lie and liars figure.
There’s no data....They pluck figures out of mid-air.
when do they start adding pot sales??? that should give it a real kick in the azz...
Only a fool would
Or out of their orifice, which liberals are famous for
So long as “GDP” includes government spending, “GDP” is a worthless metric.
That scant dip effectively left GO unchanged at $30,210.6 billion in the first quarter of 2014.
Whatever. There’s been a somewhat controlled shrinkage of the real economy (real production) for decades, with one previously productive subgroup after another shunted out of it. Technically inclined people should see where out-of-touch business, political and academic bosses are taking it and focus on preparing themselves to survive the outcome.
It is obvious they moved the bad numbers from Q2 into Q1 so that they could avoid having two negative quarters meeting the common definition of recession.
So yes, they manipulated the numbers for political purposes. Totally corrupt. We’ve become a two bit banana republic...
LIEberals LIE!
Ophonybama and his cronies are LIEberals.
LIEberals LIE!
“I don’t believe anything coming out of government. Every agency has been corrupted by leftists.”
Yep. Only in a corrupt banana-republic can several million more people lose their jobs but the unemployment number drop just before an election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.