Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: molewhacka
The companies that own the infrastructure should be free to charge whatever the market will bear so long as we permit a free market.

Role of property rights? That's hilarious. Wasn't most of that infrastructure built benefit of monopoly deals? What free market?

15 posted on 08/04/2014 8:05:29 AM PDT by Stentor (Maybe the Goldman Sachs thing is just a coincidence. /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Stentor
Role of property rights? That's hilarious. Wasn't most of that infrastructure built benefit of monopoly deals? What free market?

Hence the caveat, "so long as we permit a free market." The point is that, in the long run, a truly free market delivers better products and services at better prices than a market with government interference.

'If you don't like it, don't buy it' is far superior to 'if you don't like or aren't even going to use it, you still have to pay for it.'

16 posted on 08/04/2014 9:24:39 AM PDT by molewhacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Stentor

I always found it funny that AT&T built the infrastructure and after their break-up they were forced to allow others to use what they did not have to lay, the cable so to speak.


17 posted on 08/04/2014 9:39:39 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson