Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saving Lives One Baby at a Time The Case for Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers
Life News ^ | 8/4/14 | Matthew Clark

Posted on 08/04/2014 5:52:44 AM PDT by wagglebee

Each year pro-life pregnancy centers save thousands of lives. Women in their most desperate time of need, searching for answers and just a simple helping hand, have been ministered to. Countless future doctors, nurses, engineers, inventors, and moms and dads of the next generation have been saved because their moms made the choice to let them live. Those unborn children were given a chance because someone gave their mom a chance, a chance for hope, a chance for success.

Yet, to pro-abortion radicals, these pro-life centers are the competition. They are the competition for Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills. Abortion is big business. Abortion radicals have a billion dollar industry to protect, and pro-life centers are cutting into their profits.

As a result, pro-abortion legislators in cities and states across America developed a plan to put these pro-life centers out of business. One of the earliest efforts was in New York City.

NYC enacted an ordnance in 2011 aimed at shutting down pro-life pregnancy centers. The ordinance would force crisis pregnancy centers to express – communicate to women in need – opinions about abortion that they not only disagree with but that cut at the very core of their mission – to help women and save lives. The law essentially seeks to make pro-life centers become abortion advocates.

To refuse to obey these draconian, anti-life regulations would subject these pro-life organizations to crippling fines and penalties. This ordinance, and those like it being considered elsewhere in the country, would either cause these pro-life centers to shutdown or effectively shut down their pro-life message. These types of regulations clearly violate the First Amendment free speech rights of pro-life groups.

This is intolerable, and in 2011, the ACLJ filed suit, representing a majority of the Crisis Pregnancy Centers in New York City. In the litigation, the ACLJ represents The Evergreen Association (Expectant Mother Care Pregnancy Centers-EMC Frontline Pregnancy Centers) and Life Center of New York (AAA Pregnancy Problems Center), which operate numerous pro-life pregnancy centers across New York City.

What’s at stake in this case is monumental. Just one of our clients, “has served over 125,000 clients since 1985, with over 42,000 certain saves from abortion.” Multiply that by the hundreds of other organizations across the country that could face similar crippling treatment if these unconstitutional regulations are allowed to stand and the lives of hundreds of thousands of unborn babies are at stake.

In July 2011, we achieved a significant pro-life victory in this case as a federal district court issued a preliminary injunction, halting the pro-abortion regulation the day before it was set to take effect. As a result, for the past two and a half years our clients have been protected, and the lives of unborn children have been saved as these centers have been able to continue their lifesaving work unhindered by unconstitutional free speech violations.

The City naturally appealed to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. In September 2012, several of my colleagues here at the ACLJ argued this case in federal appeals court.

Since then we have been awaiting the 2nd Circuit’s ruling, in what has become an unusually long wait. Yet, each day that goes by, these pro-life centers are protected by the injunction. For over 900 days, this pro-abortion regulation has not been able to go into effect, and lives are being saved.

Every day, every life, is a victory.

LifeNews Note: Matthew Clark is an attorney for the ACLJ, residing in northern Virginia. He has been actively involved in Virginia politics for over a decade. You can follow Matthew on Twitter @_MatthewClark.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; pregnancycenters; prolife
Yet, to pro-abortion radicals, these pro-life centers are the competition. They are the competition for Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills. Abortion is big business. Abortion radicals have a billion dollar industry to protect, and pro-life centers are cutting into their profits.

NOTHING is more important to the left than killing babies and the blood money that comes with it.

1 posted on 08/04/2014 5:52:44 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 08/04/2014 5:53:50 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 08/04/2014 5:54:15 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Nothing is more important to the government than funding abortion also.

Do you think the US Government would ever fund “pro life centers” at the same level they fund Planned Parenthood?


4 posted on 08/04/2014 5:57:15 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsXmL7kJKTU&feature=youtu.be

Pelosi, Abortion, Hamas


5 posted on 08/04/2014 6:36:00 AM PDT by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“... with over 42,000 certain saves from abortion.”

Liberals, in a different context and on a different day will fret about declining rate of growth in population and look to loosen immigration rules to make up the difference in lost tax revenues. (while wilfully ignoring the cost to the public treasury in welfare costs, I guess because it comes out of a different budget)


6 posted on 08/04/2014 7:59:04 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson